Team activities can teach more skills to individual more than other activities ideally. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.1

Acquiring several skills is very significant in one's life. It is said that work collectively can be more conducive to expand an individual's horizon than other types of activities. I agree with the view despite having some drawbacks and I will put forward some evidences as to why group work is really effective. An individual can face several inconveniences when he will work in a team. Firstly, team tasks are a challenging duty. Because, it requires calmness, patience. Furthermore, to cope up with the remaining members of the group is definitely necessary for a person. Secondly, it has a feasibility to be attacked by his leaders. As a result, the rest of workers feel regretful, dismal which can aggravate their work-willing considerably. For example, Statistics reported that in India, a host of workers is abortive to adjust their group members which caused workers to be out of jobs as they were very sad and sullen. On the other hand, although it demonstrates a few negative points, its advantages are immense. The prime opportunity is that assembly activities can introduce oneself to some versatile citizens who can manage a party skilfully. Afterwards, one will have the ability to handle any situation and any committee very adroitly. The next favour is that if a person can be a team instructor, then he will have the knowledge how to conduct a party efficiently and technically which will increase his potentiality. However, other types of works do not have those facilities leadership facilities. For instance,