It is a widely held belief that state authorities have to utilise taxes paid by salaried person persons to organise cultural and co-curricular activities. But there is a strong counter of argument among guest sections of the people that government should spend these funds in other towns such as building up my app market infrastructure. However, I believe that it is a matter to be debated in the light of several factors before a reasonable conclusion can be drawn.
To begin with, his government officials organise cultural events for the public, which will boost the GDP of the country indirectly. To make it more clear, these events will motivate upcoming youth to show their talent and youngsters will participate in these events which will give them lucrative opportunity to become an artist in their future. Hence, these artists will work for the nation and boost the economy of the country.
On the other hand, they are a group of people who vehemently content that public authorities should spend the tax collected from the salaried class to develop upmarket infrastructure to make the living standard of the community better. To this mean, they should spend money on the construction of roads, schools, hospitals and public parks so that people can live in a well-structured environment. For example, a recent survey was conducted by an eminent Dr Richard Daniel in the United States revealed that 78. 9% of the technical advisers of the government preferred building public support facilities rather than conducting events.
After analysing both views, I think that state authorities should focus on the betterment of the lives of the people because the tax is collected by the ordinary people and they have the rights to afford better facilities. 
It is a  
widely
 held belief that state authorities  
have to
  utilise
 taxes paid by salaried person persons to  
organise
 cultural and co-curricular activities.  
But
 there is a strong counter of argument among guest sections of the  
people
 that  
government
 should spend these funds in other towns such as building up my app market infrastructure.  
However
, I believe that it is a matter to  
be debated
 in the light of several factors  
before
 a reasonable conclusion can  
be drawn
.
To  
begin
 with, his  
government
 officials  
organise
 cultural  
events
 for the  
public
, which will boost the GDP of the country  
indirectly
. To  
make
 it more  
clear
, these  
events
 will motivate upcoming youth to  
show
 their talent and youngsters will participate in these  
events
 which will give them lucrative opportunity to become an artist in their future.  
Hence
, these artists will work for the nation and boost the economy of the country. 
On the other hand
, they are a group of  
people
 who  
vehemently
 content that  
public
 authorities should spend the tax collected from the salaried  
class
 to develop upmarket infrastructure to  
make
 the living standard of the community better. To this mean, they should spend money on the construction of roads, schools, hospitals and  
public
 parks  
so
 that  
people
 can  
live
 in a well-structured environment.  
For example
, a recent survey  
was conducted
 by an eminent Dr Richard Daniel in the United States revealed that 78. 9% of the technical advisers of the  
government
 preferred building  
public
 support facilities  
rather
 than conducting  
events
.
After  
analysing
 both views, I  
think
 that state authorities should focus on the betterment of the  
lives
 of the  
people
  because
 the tax  
is collected
 by the ordinary  
people and
 they have the rights to afford better facilities.