It is a widely held belief that state authorities have to utilise taxes paid by salaried person persons to organise cultural and co-curricular activities. But there is a strong counter of argument among guest sections of the people that government should spend these funds in other towns such as building up my app market infrastructure. However, I believe that it is a matter to be debated in the light of several factors before a reasonable conclusion can be drawn.
To begin with, his government officials organise cultural events for the public, which will boost the GDP of the country indirectly. To make it more clear, these events will motivate upcoming youth to show their talent and youngsters will participate in these events which will give them lucrative opportunity to become an artist in their future. Hence, these artists will work for the nation and boost the economy of the country.
On the other hand, they are a group of people who vehemently content that public authorities should spend the tax collected from the salaried class to develop upmarket infrastructure to make the living standard of the community better. To this mean, they should spend money on the construction of roads, schools, hospitals and public parks so that people can live in a well-structured environment. For example, a recent survey was conducted by an eminent Dr Richard Daniel in the United States revealed that 78. 9% of the technical advisers of the government preferred building public support facilities rather than conducting events.
After analysing both views, I think that state authorities should focus on the betterment of the lives of the people because the tax is collected by the ordinary people and they have the rights to afford better facilities.
It is a
widely
held belief that state authorities
have to
utilise
taxes paid by salaried person persons to
organise
cultural and co-curricular activities.
But
there is a strong counter of argument among guest sections of the
people
that
government
should spend these funds in other towns such as building up my app market infrastructure.
However
, I believe that it is a matter to
be debated
in the light of several factors
before
a reasonable conclusion can
be drawn
.
To
begin
with, his
government
officials
organise
cultural
events
for the
public
, which will boost the GDP of the country
indirectly
. To
make
it more
clear
, these
events
will motivate upcoming youth to
show
their talent and youngsters will participate in these
events
which will give them lucrative opportunity to become an artist in their future.
Hence
, these artists will work for the nation and boost the economy of the country.
On the other hand
, they are a group of
people
who
vehemently
content that
public
authorities should spend the tax collected from the salaried
class
to develop upmarket infrastructure to
make
the living standard of the community better. To this mean, they should spend money on the construction of roads, schools, hospitals and
public
parks
so
that
people
can
live
in a well-structured environment.
For example
, a recent survey
was conducted
by an eminent Dr Richard Daniel in the United States revealed that 78. 9% of the technical advisers of the
government
preferred building
public
support facilities
rather
than conducting
events
.
After
analysing
both views, I
think
that state authorities should focus on the betterment of the
lives
of the
people
because
the tax
is collected
by the ordinary
people and
they have the rights to afford better facilities.