summarize the points made in the reading and the lecture about solutions for eliminating a specific kind of cheatgrass from the nature

The reading asserts that cheatgrass, which is a native plant for Asia and Europe, has harmful effects on wild life in the North America, and provides three solutions to overcome this issue; Nevertheless, the lecturer disagrees with this argument and refutes each of the points made in the passage. To beging with, the author mentions that grazer animals such as cows can be used to reduce the cheatgrass from the pairie. This specific argument is challenged by the professor. He believes that cheatgrasses are not cattles' favorite food type. Moreover, he adds that once we release the grazers in the land, they will start to eat native plants which we want to preserve. As a result, he thinks that while cheatgrasses will not be eaten by grazers, this plan will have adverse effects, reducing indegenius species. Secondly, the text states that since cheatgrasses burn swiftly, using fire can destroy the whole population of which in an area. The professor, however, claim that these grasses has enormous number of seeds which are pushed down, hidden in the soil. He thinks that using fire will only eliminate grasses from the surface, nonetheless, after a short time the seeds will start to grow and thrive the population of unwanted plants in the era. Finally, according to the passage, using specific kinds of parasites will stop grasscheaters from growing. The professor opposes this argument, explaining that the fungal species and the grass species have lived together for too many years and cheatgrasses are resistant to fungi so far. Furthermore, he mentions that the fungi will only remove weak and vulnerable plants, on the other hand, other plants which are strong, will live with no problem and keep eliminating native plants like before.