Information sharing as much as possible among scientific researchers, businessmen and academicians, is believed by some to be beneficial to the people involved; however, others disagree that not all data should be distributed without remuneration. I concur with the latter and both views will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, data sharing should be encouraged because it leads to ground discoveries, profound creativity and productivity of a particular field of knowledge. For example, if the medical scientists, drafted from all over the world, had not given out their individual ideas to the creation of the newly discovered Ebola vaccine, the death rate and predicted prevalence rate of the disease, may be the increase in the near future. This may be not be possible if each of these esteemed individuals kept back their contribution.
However, the synergy between the profession may be counterproductive if one of the parties involved is insincere; consequently, the relationship becomes parasitic as one eventually gains more than the other. For instance, a businessman, who has shared some unimportant information about his product, gets more from his colleague that gave out the crucial part of his; as a result, his profits and sales may eventually double that of his victim because of the unfair deal.
Having described both views, I am of the opinion that the exchange of ideas is beneficial overall; nonetheless, such agreements must have a legal backing such that defaulters will face a legal punishment if found guilty. To illustrate, a university should be fine for a huge amount of money if agreements to exchange new teaching techniques and equipment (for better training of students) is not done assigned in a legal document.
In conclusion, it is essential to share ideas among researchers, businesses and in the education section, but this should be done legally to avoid being disadvantaged
Information sharing as much as possible among scientific researchers, businessmen and academicians,
is believed
by
some
to be beneficial to the
people
involved;
however
, others disagree that not all data should
be distributed
without remuneration. I concur with the latter and both views will
be discussed
in this essay.
To
begin
with, data sharing should
be encouraged
because
it leads to ground discoveries, profound creativity and productivity of a particular field of knowledge.
For example
, if the medical scientists, drafted from all over the world, had not
given
out their individual
ideas
to the creation of the
newly
discovered Ebola vaccine, the death rate and predicted prevalence rate of the disease, may be the increase in the near future. This may be not
be
possible if each of these esteemed individuals
kept
back their contribution.
However
, the synergy between the profession may be counterproductive if one of the parties involved is insincere;
consequently
, the relationship becomes parasitic as one
eventually
gains more than the other.
For instance
, a businessman, who has shared
some
unimportant information about his product,
gets
more from his colleague that gave out the crucial part of his;
as a result
, his profits and sales may
eventually
double that of his victim
because
of the unfair deal.
Having
described
both views, I am of the opinion that the exchange of
ideas
is beneficial
overall
; nonetheless, such agreements
must
have a legal backing such that defaulters will face a legal punishment if found guilty. To illustrate, a university should be fine for a huge amount of money if agreements to exchange new teaching techniques and equipment (for better training of students) is not done assigned in a legal document.
In conclusion
, it is essential to share
ideas
among researchers, businesses and in the education section,
but
this should
be done
legally
to avoid
being disadvantaged