Nowadays, with the development of education and the higher need of knowledge economy, more and more people are deciding to go to university. Some argue that because higher education is not beneficial for society, students ought to self-fund for their tuition fees. I completely disagree with this statement because of the reasons listed below.
To begin with, that governments do not pay tuition fee will lessen learning opportunities for gifted students who have financial issues. For instance, prodigies who come frome less privileged background might not be able to reach full potential in their chosen fields and have less a chance of a successful career. Thus, a supposed brilliant scientist might just be a mediorce accountant, causing a waste of talent. This is because universities usually have the best professors and necessary facilities, and without attending one, gifted students might not be able to improve their skills. Moreover, companies in general tend to hire someone with a degree since it's a proof of capability and diligence. Consequently, students who can't afford to pursue higher education won't have good employability prospects.
Second, investment in education is greatly beneficial for society. For example, a less educated workforce bears a greater risk of unemployment in the economic downturn, which leads to problems such as homelessness, crimes and other social evils. Furthermore, unskilled labour earns much less than educated people do, and therefore they contribute less income tax, less revenue for the government. Besides, the highly skilled individuals that universities product is essential to solve many urgent problems such as population growth, global warming, and so on.
In conclusion, an investment in education can help gifted but less privileged students have a fairer chance at life, and contribute greatly to many aspects of society. Therefore, government should have policy to support students to attend higher education for many benefits it brings, both individually and socially.
Nowadays, with the development of
education
and the higher need of knowledge economy, more and more
people
are deciding to go to university.
Some
argue that
because
higher
education
is not beneficial for society,
students
ought to self-fund for their tuition fees. I completely disagree with this statement
because
of the reasons listed below.
To
begin
with, that
governments
do not pay tuition fee will lessen learning opportunities for gifted
students
who have financial issues.
For instance
, prodigies who
come
frome
less
privileged background might not be able to reach full potential in their chosen fields and have
less
a chance of a successful career.
Thus
, a supposed brilliant scientist might
just
be a
mediorce
accountant, causing a waste of talent. This is
because
universities
usually
have the best professors and necessary facilities, and without attending one, gifted
students
might not be able to
improve
their
skills
.
Moreover
,
companies
in general
tend to hire someone with a degree since it's a proof of capability and diligence.
Consequently
,
students
who can't afford to pursue higher
education
won't have
good
employability prospects.
Second, investment in
education
is
greatly
beneficial for society.
For example
, a
less
educated workforce bears a greater
risk
of unemployment in the economic downturn, which leads to problems such as homelessness, crimes and other social evils.
Furthermore
, unskilled
labour
earns much
less
than educated
people
do, and
therefore
they contribute
less
income tax,
less
revenue for the
government
.
Besides
, the
highly
skilled individuals that
universities
product is essential to solve
many
urgent problems such as population growth, global warming, and
so
on.
In conclusion
, an investment in
education
can
help
gifted
but
less
privileged
students
have a fairer chance at life, and contribute
greatly
to
many
aspects of society.
Therefore
,
government
should have policy to support
students
to attend higher
education
for
many
benefits it brings, both
individually
and
socially
.