Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Plethora of people think that while recruiting, companies should aim at taking people who

Plethora of people think that while recruiting, companies should aim at taking people who rLOwL
Plethora of people think that while recruiting, companies should aim at taking people who are innovative and are able to work on their own, while many others consider that they should hire people who can collaborate and work as a team. Both the views has its own pros and cons, and we have to analyse both the views before coming to any conclusion. People who can work alone, are known for their out of the box thinking. Means people who are creative can work in sylos and dont require a team for the compilation of the job. For example people working in creative agencies work best when they are left alone, then only their creative juices flow and they are able to create new stuff. Another type of people who work alone, are the investors or financial planners; these people work alone since a team is not required and job is such that one person can create a financial plans and goals. Also collaboration is not required in this case since a knowledge of a person is of prime importance. For example small ca firms often have a single owner or proprietor and no team work is required as such. But the flip side is also true, some jobs do require people who can collaborate and work together; these kind of jobs have a nature in which different aspects has to be considered; for example strategy building, in this lot of input is required from different teams and those data needs to be put together to analyse the reasoning. Another area, where team work is must is one where the amount of work is large and a team is required to finish the work. For example product creation, it is cumbersome task to create new products and hence a team is required to finish the work and create a final product. In the end, i would like to conclude by mentioning my point of view, some tasks or job require a team while others a person who can work alone and create something new. Hence it’s the nature of work on which it depends.
Plethora of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that while recruiting,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
should aim at taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are innovative and are able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
, while
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
others consider that they should hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
can collaborate and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
. Both the views has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
pros and cons, and we
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
Possible spelling mistake. 'analyse' is British English.
analyse
both the views
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
coming to any conclusion.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
alone
,
are known
for their
Did you mean "out-of-the-box"?
out of the box
thinking. Means
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are creative can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
in
Possible spelling mistake found.
sylos
and
Possible spelling mistake found
dont
require a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
for the compilation of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
working in creative agencies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
best when they are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
left
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
alone
, then
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
their creative juices
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
flow and
they are able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
create
new stuff.

Another type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
alone
, are the investors or financial planners; these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
alone
since a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
is not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
is such that one person can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
create
a financial plans and goals.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Also
collaboration is not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
in this case
since a knowledge of a person is of prime importance. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
ca firms
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
have a single owner or proprietor and no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
as such.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
the flip side is
also
true,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
do require
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
can collaborate and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
together;
Did you mean "this kind" or "these kinds"?
these kind
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
have a nature in which
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
aspects
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
be considered
; for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
strategy building, in this lot of input is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
teams
and those data needs to
be put
together to
Possible spelling mistake. 'analyse' is British English.
analyse
the reasoning.

Another area, where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
The verb 'must' requires the base form of the verb: "be"
is
one where the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
is large and a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
to finish the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
. For
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
example
product creation, it is cumbersome task to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
create
new products and
hence
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
required
to finish the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
create
a final product.

In the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
,
Did you mean "I"?
i
would like
to conclude
by mentioning my point of view,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
tasks or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
require a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
while others a person
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
alone
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
create
something new.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Hence
it’s the nature of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on which it depends.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Plethora of people think that while recruiting, companies should aim at taking people who

Essay
  American English
6 paragraphs
354 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Plethora of people think that while recruiting, companies should aim at taking people who