Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

?Structure your answers in logical paragraphs ?One main idea per paragraph ?Include an introduction and conclusion ?Support main points with an explanation and then an example ?Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately ?Vary your linking

? Structure your answers in logical paragraphs? One main idea per paragraph? Include an introduction and conclusion? Support main points with an explanation and then an example? Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately? Vary your linking 05ml

The article described how some of the ad agencies joined the “Clean Creatives” initiative and refused to work for oil & gas companies…. well, there are couple of questions that pop into my head. For starters are we supposed to believe that all of a sudden people working for ad agencies have managed to found a moral compass and it’s not just a cynical move toward other growing industries & eco friendly companies. I would argue that it’s not a reflection of their integrity and moral stance. As far as the complaint is concerned, the ad for the energy giant is supposedly “misrepresenting its image”. For me that’s a definition of an ad. Does anyone seriously believe that other ads hold any resemblance to the reality. It’s a dirty, crooked and useless business and it’s laughable to present it as anything other that that. People working for ad agencies used to behave like lawyers, they represented their clients regardless of their own views and opinions. If that’s not the case anymore, I wasn’t aware of the change. Maybe I’m too skeptical, but it sounds just like yet another way to make money. Most of the companies in the “Clean Creatives” initiative are small players on the market and wouldn’t have a chance to work with major energy concerns anyway. If the shift is sincere I applaud it, but why stop there? Maybe they should also stop making ads for clothing companies who manufacture their items in sweatshops, companies producing sugary addictive food, companies engaging in unfair competition and so on. Just as I put most of the blame not on politicians but people who voted for them, the same way I don’t demonize the energy companies. They provide resources to accommodate people’s needs. And it’s the people who buy too much, eat too much, travel too much, breed too much and consume to much on the whole. It would be useful to look in the mirror instead of blaming the middleman.

The article This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :characterizedportrayed
described
 how If the text is a generality, 'of the' is not necessary. Did you mean "some"?some
some of the
 ad agencies This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :consolidatedfused
joined
 the “Clean Creatives” initiative and refused to work for oil & gas You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies…
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterWell
well
, there are It seems that an article is missing.a couple of
couple of
 questions that pop into my head. For starters are we supposed to believe that all of a sudden You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 working for ad agencies have managed to found a moral compass and it’s not This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 a cynical This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :relocate
move
 toward other growing industries & This word is normally spelled with hyphen.eco-friendly
eco friendly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
. I would argue that it’s not a reflection of their integrity and moral stance. As far as the complaint is concerned
, the ad for the energy giant is supposedly
 “misrepresenting its image”. For me that’s a definition of an ad. Does anyone seriously
 believe that other ads hold any resemblance to the reality. It’s a dirty, crooked and useless business and it’s laughable to present it as anything other Possible typo: you repeated a wordthat
that that
. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
People
 working for ad agencies This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to behave like lawyers, they represented their clients regardless of their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 views and opinions. If that’s not the case anymore, I wasn’t aware of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alteradjust
change
. Maybe I’m too skeptical, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it sounds This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 like yet
 another way to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 money. Most of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 in the “Clean Creatives” initiative are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 players on the market and wouldn’t have a chance to work with major energy concerns anyway. If the shift is sincere I applaud it, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 why This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 there? Maybe they should also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 making ads for clothing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 who manufacture their items in sweatshops, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 producing sugary addictive food, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 engaging in unfair competition and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 on. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
Just
 as I put most of the blame not on politicians This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who voted for them, the same way I don’t demonize the energy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
. They provide resources to accommodate You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people’s
 needs. And it’s the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 too You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenough
much
, eat too You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenough
much
, travel too You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenough
much
, breed too You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenough
much
 and consume Did you mean "too"?too
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withenough
much
on the whole
. It would be useful to look in the mirror instead
 of blaming the middleman. 