It is widely argued that speaking is a more manipulative form of communication rather than writing. Personally, I opine that both of these views are willing to bring several merits, primarily depending upon the situation to use which platform is more appropriate.
On the one side, I believe that speaking is an extremely impactful way to communicate. To begin with, there are hardly any necessities of grammar in terms of normal speaking, which makes it faster and less challenging to understand other people’s ideas in order to avoid conflicts or confusions. This might be particularly beneficial for introductions or explanations when questions which constantly appeared will be answered immediately. Furthermore, verbal communications enable people to engender their emotions thanks to their various tones in their voice which can, for example, powerfully make parents at school understand their children's critical problems obviously rather than written informing paper by teachers.
On the other side, the written form is also regarded as an efficient tool of communication. To start with in some form of places such as offices emails and documents are usually recorded in digital files which will be saved in storage. This explains why many announcements including invitations, cancellations or requests are usually kept in written form. Furthermore, with careful check in terms of grammar, people are allowed to multi-task in the way that they can maintain separate conversations, for example, with their friends, managers or parents. This is particularly favourable to school, working areas or especially multinational companies since people nowadays have different time frames to gain their efficiency.
To sum up, both speaking and writing modes of communication do show their own benefits and I am convinced that people have to carefully decide what form to do in many specific situations. 
It is  
widely
 argued that speaking is a more manipulative  
form
 of  
communication
  rather
 than writing.  
Personally
, I opine that both of these views are willing to bring several merits,  
primarily
 depending upon the situation to  
use
 which platform is more appropriate.
On the one side, I believe that speaking is an  
extremely
 impactful way to communicate. To  
begin
 with, there are hardly any necessities of grammar in terms of normal speaking, which  
makes
 it faster and less challenging to understand other  
people’s
  ideas
 in order to avoid conflicts or confusions. This might be  
particularly
 beneficial for introductions or explanations when questions which  
constantly
 appeared will  
be answered
 immediately.  
Furthermore
, verbal communications enable  
people
 to engender their emotions thanks to their various tones in their voice which can,  
for example
,  
powerfully
  make
 parents at school understand their children's critical problems  
obviously
  rather
 than written informing paper by teachers.
On the other side, the written  
form
 is  
also
 regarded as an efficient tool of  
communication
. To  
start
 with in  
some
  form
 of places such as offices emails and documents are  
usually
 recorded in digital files which will  
be saved
 in storage. This  
explains
 why  
many
 announcements including invitations, cancellations or requests are  
usually
  kept
 in written  
form
.  
Furthermore
, with careful  
check
 in terms of grammar,  
people
 are  
allowed
 to multi-task in the way that they can maintain separate conversations,  
for example
, with their friends, managers or parents. This is  
particularly
  favourable
 to school, working areas or  
especially
 multinational  
companies
 since  
people
 nowadays have  
different
 time frames to gain their efficiency.
To sum up, both speaking and writing modes of  
communication
 do  
show
 their  
own
  benefits and
 I  
am convinced
 that  
people
  have to
  carefully
 decide what  
form
 to do in  
many
 specific situations.