A lot of people want to construct their house or office the way it describes them while others think that government should regulate the plan of construction of new houses or offices in big cities.
Although state can apply some policies that newly constructed building should adhere, they can’t completely control the layout component of it. In this essay, we’ll be discussing both of these views that whether a ministry should regulate the newly constructed buildings or not. However, I agree with the latter one where they can’t regulate the design part which is the dream of the person who is financing it.
Regime can put some policies in order to regulate the method of the newly constructed buildings. These policies are required because initially big cities were designed to sustain a very less number of people rather than which they are accommodating now which in turn leads to the consumption of more resources. For example, Bangalore was designed to accommodate 1 million people, but now it’s accommodating around seventy to eight hundred thousand, which is seven times the original number which it’s infrastructure was supposed to sustain.
We live in a democracy where regime can’t control our right to dream. People have a dream to own a house in the locality of their choice, so as long as the person buy or lease a land of their choice. Of course ministry can put some policies which are good for the environment. For example, water harvesting, solar panel etc. That a person can adhere because he knows that’s the functional part of the design, not the non functional section. People are attached to the non functional component of the layout so the state shouldn’t be interfering with the non functional sector of the model.
In Conclusion, People should have aspirations and if they have the means to sustain those aspirations like building a house and regime shouldn’t regulate those parts.
A lot of
people
want to construct their
house
or office the way it
describes
them while others
think
that
government
should
regulate
the plan of construction of new
houses
or offices in
big
cities.
Although state can apply
some
policies
that
newly
constructed
building
should adhere, they can’t completely control the layout component of it. In this essay, we’ll be discussing both of these views that whether a ministry should
regulate
the
newly
constructed
buildings
or not.
However
, I
agree
with the latter one where they can’t
regulate
the design part which is the dream of the person who is financing it.
Regime can put
some
policies
in order to
regulate
the method of the
newly
constructed
buildings
. These
policies
are required
because
initially
big
cities
were designed
to sustain a
very
less number of
people
rather
than which they are accommodating
now
which in turn leads to the consumption of more resources.
For example
, Bangalore
was designed
to accommodate 1 million
people
,
but
now
it’s accommodating around seventy to eight hundred thousand, which is seven times the original number which it’s infrastructure
was supposed
to sustain.
We
live
in a democracy where regime can’t control our right to dream.
People
have a dream to
own
a
house
in the locality of their choice,
so
as long as the person
buy
or lease a land of their choice.
Of course
ministry can put
some
policies
which are
good
for the environment.
For example
, water harvesting, solar panel etc. That a person can adhere
because
he knows that’s the
functional
part of the design, not the non
functional
section.
People
are attached
to the non
functional
component of the layout
so
the state shouldn’t be interfering with the non
functional
sector of the model.
In Conclusion
,
People
should have aspirations and if they have the means to sustain those aspirations like
building
a
house
and regime shouldn’t
regulate
those parts.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes