There has always been considerable discussion and debate about whether governments in many countries should spend taxpayers’ money on space research. In my view, it is impossible to justify the amount of money spent on space research. Generally speaking, the main reason for this position is that there are several areas in which the money could be invested better. When we have so many problems and hungry people in the Earth, spending money on space is not a good choice at all.
The first point to make is that governments have a responsibility to spend public money on projects that bring a benefit to the citizens. This has not been the case with space research as most developments have been limited to helping astronauts in space or have been very specialised. For example, it is not of great value to the general public that we now have pens and biros that can write upside down. This does not merit the huge amount of money spent. Little success has been made so far on space exploration except landing on the Moon or knowing that Mars had once been a place for living being. What good that can bring to people who are starving in many countries?
The second point to make is that there are many much more urgent projects on Earth that require investment. If governments spent less money on space research, then they would be able to help solve some of these problems such as population control, elimination of diseases like cholera, global warming and food shortages. It seems to me that all of these issues are more important because they affect the lives of millions of ordinary people. An illustration of this is that the US government could provide food for all the starving people in the world if they did not spend so much on NASA.
My conclusion is that politicians should not fund space research. The grounds for saying this are that it is very costly and provides little real benefits. Furthermore, there are several more urgent issues that need to be funded.
There has always been considerable discussion and debate about whether
governments
in
many
countries should spend taxpayers’
money
on
space
research
. In my view, it is impossible to justify the amount of
money
spent on
space
research
.
Generally
speaking, the main reason for this position is that there are several areas in which the
money
could
be invested
better. When we have
so
many
problems and hungry
people
in the Earth, spending
money
on
space
is not a
good
choice at all.
The
first
point to
make
is that
governments
have a responsibility to spend public
money
on projects that bring a benefit to the citizens. This has not been the case with
space
research
as most developments have
been limited
to helping astronauts in
space
or have been
very
specialised
.
For example
, it is not of great value to the
general public
that we
now
have pens and
biros
that can write upside down. This does not merit the huge amount of
money
spent.
Little
success has
been made
so
far on
space
exploration except landing on the Moon or knowing that Mars had once been a place for living being. What
good
that can bring to
people
who are starving in
many
countries?
The second point to
make
is that there are
many
much more urgent projects on Earth that require investment. If
governments
spent less
money
on
space
research
, then they would be able to
help
solve
some
of these problems such as population control, elimination of diseases like cholera, global warming and food shortages. It seems to me that all of these issues are more
important
because
they affect the
lives
of millions of ordinary
people
. An illustration of this is that the US
government
could provide food for all the starving
people
in the world if they did not spend
so
much on NASA.
My conclusion is that politicians should not fund
space
research
. The grounds for saying this are that it is
very
costly and provides
little
real benefits.
Furthermore
, there are several more urgent issues that need to
be funded
.