There is an opinion that primarily staff members who have dedicated
many years to working for a particular company should be given
executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint in as
much as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with
an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated.
Although senior employees have proved to be reliable and loyal, more
often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of actual skills. This
is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard
and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today’s highly
competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers
may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest
technological advances into business processes, which is irreplaceable
for every company to flourish.
Yet another reason why less experienced staff members should have
even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated
to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they still will not be
given a higher position in a company, young employees are likely to
grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a
company’s revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent
IT entrepreneur (wrote enTERpreneur on the exam) Pavel Durov had to
leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was
not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up
his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of
highly qualified workers.
To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a
particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally
promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides
that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus
contributing to the prosperity of a company
There is an opinion that
primarily
staff members who have dedicated
many
years to working for a particular
company
should be
given
executive positions in a
company
. I disagree with this viewpoint in as
much as younger workers may have more
skills
and if not provided with
an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated.
Although senior employees have proved to be reliable and loyal, more
often
than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of actual
skills
. This
is
because
young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their
hard
and soft
skills
in order to
meet
the requirements of
today
’s
highly
competitive job market.
Therefore
, having
been promoted
, such workers
may bring innovation and
help
to better incorporate the latest
technological advances into business processes, which is irreplaceable
for every
company
to flourish.
Yet
another reason why less experienced staff members should have
even chances for a promotion is that
otherwise
they will not
be motivated
to do their best. Knowing that
however
hard
they try, they
still
will not be
given
a higher position in a
company
, young employees are likely to
grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may
negatively
affect a
company
’s revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent
IT entrepreneur (wrote
enTERpreneur
on the exam) Pavel
Durov
had to
leave
his
first
workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was
not rewarded with a leading role.
As a result
, he has
successfully
set up
his
own
business, while his employer lost his
company
due to a lack of
highly
qualified workers.
To sum up,
even though
individuals who have worked fewer years for a
particular
company
might be less trustworthy, they should be
equally
promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and
skill
sets.
Besides
that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest,
thus
contributing to the prosperity of a
company