Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some suggest one government in the word is beeter rather than national government in different countries. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.

Some suggest one government in the word is beeter rather than national government in different countries. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages. mX8qL
There have been suggestions historically for a single government that could control all nations. In my opinion, there are utopian benefits that would result from this, however, the drawbacks related to autonomy make it a negative theoretical proposal. Supporters argue a single government would be more effective and focused. This is best illustrated through major problems that all nations currently struggle to solve such as climate change and the recent health crisis facing the world. A single centralized government could better protect the environment by enacting strict legislation against the burning of fossil fuels and force all citizens to get vaccinated against corona. In purely hypothetical terms, such unilateral power could achieve tremendous ends. However, in reality, there is a strong likelihood that a government would either pursue different, less desirable goals or be unable to enforce their mandates. Beyond the infeasibility of such a world government, there are more basic reasons to oppose its existence. Variety in government is valuable in itself. Take for example the different governments currently in power around the world. Each country has, to varying degrees, chosen a government that represents their values and enacts laws based on the kind of nation they wish to have. The result is that some countries, such as those in Western Europe, lean more towards a socialist system that ensures a minimum standard of living for all citizens, others place greater emphasis on individual empowerment, others on transparency and still others on security over freedom. This diversity is a defining feature of human society. In conclusion, a single government for the entire planet could help resolve global issues but would ultimately limit the distinctiveness of each individual nation. Therefore, there are other solutions that should be undertaken to remedy the current crisis of confidence in government
There have been suggestions
historically
for a
single
government
that could control all
nations
. In my opinion, there are utopian benefits that would result from this,
however
, the drawbacks related to autonomy
make
it a
negative
theoretical proposal.

Supporters argue a
single
government
would be more effective and focused. This is best illustrated through major problems that all
nations
currently
struggle to solve such as climate
change
and the recent health crisis facing the world. A
single
centralized
government
could better protect the environment by enacting strict legislation against the burning of fossil fuels and force all citizens to
get
vaccinated against corona. In
purely
hypothetical terms, such unilateral power could achieve tremendous ends.
However
, in reality, there is a strong likelihood that a
government
would either pursue
different
, less desirable goals or be unable to enforce their mandates.

Beyond the
infeasibility
of such a world
government
, there are more basic reasons to oppose its existence. Variety in
government
is valuable in itself. Take
for example
the
different
governments
currently
in power around the world. Each country has, to varying degrees, chosen a
government
that represents their values and enacts laws based on the kind of
nation
they wish to have. The result is that
some
countries, such as those in Western Europe, lean more towards a socialist system that ensures a minimum standard of living for all citizens, others place greater emphasis on individual empowerment, others on transparency and
still
others on security over freedom. This diversity is a defining feature of human society.

In conclusion
, a
single
government
for the entire planet could
help
resolve global issues
but
would
ultimately
limit the distinctiveness of each individual
nation
.
Therefore
, there are
other
solutions that should be undertaken to remedy the
current
crisis of confidence in
government
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some suggest one government in the word is beeter rather than national government in different countries. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
296 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6.5band
    Some believe one government is better than national government. Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages.
    There have been suggestions historically for a single government that could control all nations. In my opinion, there are utopian benefits that would result from this, however, the drawbacks related to autonomy make it a negative theoretical proposal. Supporters argue a single government would be m...
  • 6band
    living in city or in town
    The more society develops, the more people want to live and work in a city rather than living in a peaceful village. Many people believe that the modernity of the city will improve their life. Whether living in the city is really a good choice for all of us? One of the top reasons for living in lar...
  • 5band
    advantages of a vegetarian diet
    A well-balanced vegan diet can provide many benefits. The two most significant advantages of a vegetarian diet are decreasing the risk of chronic disease and reducing greenhouse gas emissions caused by food production. Firstly, a vegan diet consumes exclusively plant-based food. Vegetables contain s...
  • 6band
    Question: Some people say that family has the most important influence on individuals. State your opinion
    Life is a staged process, and each person begins to learn as soon as he enters the world. This entire process comes to an end when people die, and people are influenced by a variety of people and situations throughout their lives. It is thought that people are most impacted by their families. From m...
  • 5.5band
    these day people in some countries are living in a throw-away society
    In the present age, the overproduction and overconsumption of people lead to some serious problems consistent with the definition of “throw-away” society, where people tend to throw-away their old items though they still work and purchase the newest version of those things. In the meantime whether i...
  • 5band
    It’s interesting to observe cats’ behaviors and know the meanings
    It’s interesting to observe cats’ behaviors and know the meanings. First of all, cats spend a great deal of time grooming. It not only keeps the cats looking good with shine and clean further but also helps insulate their bodies and keeps them warm. Secondly, you can see your cats kneading many time...