Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some say that university students should be free to choose their subjects. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion v.1

Some say that university students should be free to choose their subjects. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology. 1
Studying a self-chosen subject in higher institutions has been considered by some to be acceptable while others feel that the emphasis should only be on subjects of future benefits such as science and technology. In my opinion, it should be the duty call of scholars to decide what course suits them. Both views will be discussed in detail. The main reason why some believe undergraduates should freely choose their career part is that we never can tell what courses will dominate in subsequent decades. Perhaps it may be that other subjects such as law will dominate later on as it is being apparent that legal issues would be rampant in the not too distant future. A particularly good example is the USA, a democratic nation, where lawyers and judges are being aggressively sought due to multiple court cases requiring their services. Therefore, if they follow their favourite profession, there is a tendency to securing high-paying jobs. Nevertheless, others feel that core science subjects should be mandated because they tend to improve the standard of living. As recent advances made in these fields are already with us today; such as mobile phones, which have revolutionized communication, with possible economic stimulation and job creation, there is no doubt, as they say, citizens would experience remarkable improvements in their lives. A case in point is Apple Company, a tele-communication giant, which accounted for the highest source of internally generated revenue in China last year. As a result, they believe these courses have positive bearings in the society and as such should be made compulsory. In conclusion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, it seems to me that students should be given free hands when making course selection. This is because, if students are forced to study courses they do not fancy, they are unlikely to excel. Only in this way - freedom of choice - can society gain immensely from university education.
Studying a self-chosen
subject
in higher institutions has
been considered
by
some
to be acceptable while others feel that the emphasis should
only
be on
subjects
of future benefits such as science and technology. In my opinion, it should be the duty call of scholars to decide what
course
suits them. Both views will
be discussed
in detail.

The main reason why
some
believe undergraduates should
freely
choose their career part is that we never can
tell
what
courses
will dominate in subsequent decades. Perhaps it may be that other
subjects
such as law will dominate later on as it is being apparent that legal issues would be rampant in the not too distant future. A
particularly
good
example is the USA, a democratic nation, where lawyers and judges are being
aggressively
sought due to multiple court cases requiring their services.
Therefore
, if they follow their
favourite
profession, there is a tendency to securing high-paying jobs.

Nevertheless
, others feel that core science
subjects
should
be mandated
because
they tend to
improve
the standard of living. As recent advances made in these fields are already with us
today
; such as mobile phones, which have revolutionized communication, with possible economic stimulation and job creation, there is no doubt, as they say, citizens would experience remarkable improvements in their
lives
. A case in point is Apple
Company
, a
tele-communication
giant, which accounted for the highest source of
internally
generated revenue in China last year.
As a result
, they believe these
courses
have
positive
bearings in the society and as such should
be made
compulsory.

In conclusion
, both arguments have their merits. On balance,
however
, it seems to me that students should be
given
free hands when making
course
selection. This is
because
, if students
are forced
to study
courses
they do not fancy, they are unlikely to excel.
Only
in this way
-
freedom of choice
-
can society gain
immensely
from university education.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay Some say that university students should be free to choose their subjects. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study courses of future benefits like science and technology. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
321 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts