It is considered by some that investing country's wealth to find a living place outside earth is beneficial, while there are others who disbelieve with this opinion and suggest the authority to spend more public fortune on fixing global issues. In my opinion, spending money in order to look for another planet to live is not the best solution for humanity, while solving problems on earth would be more realistic to lead people into a better life.
On the one hand, finding other planets to live is considered to be unrealistic goal and only for the research purpose. Even if this unrealistic goal happened in the near future, only a few of rich people could afford to live those luxury life on other planets. In other words, the majority of the population on earth are still suffering from a lot problems, such as lack of education, food, health, etc. . For example, a United States astronaut which is called NASA have experimented for the last 10 decades. During those periods, not even a single project is considered successful in finding a living place on other planets. That's why, in order to create a better life, the governments need to stop wasting time and money on those projects and start giving out for people in need.
On the other hand, a lot of unsolved problems, like global warming, virus, etc. , are still haunted earthlings up until today, but it could be resolved if every country stops wasting funds and try to fix the issues. This situation happened due to the ignorance from the government in many countries. Even though, a lot of countries have already spent billion amount of money, the issues have already spread worldwide and need more determination than before. Thus, the authority needs to stop spending unnecessary fund and focusing on other issues.
In conclusion, resolving global crisis problems is more beneficial, while searching for a living place in outer space is unrealistic and brings many disadvantages because the amount of cash and time spent on the unsuccessful projects.
It
is considered
by
some
that investing country's wealth to find a living place outside earth is beneficial, while there are others who disbelieve with this opinion and suggest the authority to spend more public fortune on fixing global issues. In my opinion, spending money in order to look for another
planet
to
live
is not the best solution for humanity, while solving
problems
on earth would be more realistic to lead
people
into a better life.
On the one hand, finding
other
planets
to
live
is considered
to be unrealistic goal and
only
for the research purpose. Even if this unrealistic goal happened in the near future,
only
a few of rich
people
could afford to
live
those luxury life on
other
planets
. In
other
words, the majority of the population on earth are
still
suffering from a lot
problems
, such as lack of education, food, health, etc.
.
For example
, a United States astronaut which
is called
NASA have experimented for the last 10 decades. During those periods, not even a single project
is considered
successful in finding a living place on
other
planets
. That's why, in order to create a better life, the
governments
need to
stop
wasting time and money on those projects and
start
giving out for
people
in need.
On the
other
hand,
a lot of
unsolved
problems
, like global warming, virus, etc.
,
are
still
haunted earthlings up until
today
,
but
it could
be resolved
if every country
stops
wasting funds and try to
fix
the issues. This situation happened due to the ignorance from the
government
in
many
countries.
Even though
,
a lot of
countries have already spent
billion
amount
of money, the issues have already spread worldwide and need more determination than
before
.
Thus
, the authority needs to
stop
spending unnecessary fund and focusing on
other
issues.
In conclusion
, resolving global crisis
problems
is more beneficial, while searching for a living place in outer space is unrealistic and brings
many
disadvantages
because
the amount of cash and time spent on the unsuccessful projects.