Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think the media should reduce the amount of bad news that they publish because it might discourage people from joining normal activities that involve very little risk. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think the media should reduce the amount of bad news that they publish because it might discourage people from joining normal activities that involve very little risk. gbVM3
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that the press should put a limit on the amount of negative news that they deliver to the public owing to the fact that audiences are demotivated from participating in risk-free activities. From my point of view, I totally concur with this statement. Frequent exposure to negative news on a daily basis would be deleterious to readers. First, when people read bad news too often, they might lose faith in others. In particular, when the media delivers bad scandals about celebrities, they will be under public attack and doubted by many people, especially their fans, who have been supporting them for a long time. It results in that negative news cast a doubt on other people and their relationships would be negatively affected. Second, bad news can promote a sense of insecurity. Particularly, some pieces of information can be distorted and turn misleading. Hence, it makes readers feel confused or over-worried about their regular activities. For instance, a piece of misleading information about the harmful effects of eating tomatoes and eggs together. From the abovementioned practical concerns, the media should obviously restrict bad news. The first reason is promoting economic growth. It makes people less worried about possible dangers around them. Therefore, it also tends to engage in more social activities. Moreover, the consumption demand increases, which will give a boost to production activities and the whole country’s economy. The next reason is reducing the levels of stress when joining daily activities. In addition, people don’t aware of the dangers in their surroundings. Thus, they feel more active and optimistic. As a result, it helps lower the chances of getting stressed or even depressed when they try to immerse themselves in their normal activities, which helps them fully experience their life. Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that negative information is harmful to the audiences. Therefore, bad news should be restricted.
In contemporary society, it is
generally
believed that the press should put a limit on the amount of
negative
news
that they deliver to the public owing to the fact that audiences
are demotivated
from participating in
risk
-free
activities
. From my point of view, I
totally
concur with this statement.

Frequent exposure to
negative
news
on a daily basis would be deleterious to readers.
First
, when
people
read
bad
news
too
often
, they might lose faith in others.
In particular
, when the media
delivers
bad
scandals about celebrities, they will be under public attack and doubted by
many
people
,
especially
their fans, who have been supporting them for a long time. It results in that
negative
news
cast a doubt on other
people
and their relationships would be
negatively
affected
. Second,
bad
news
can promote a sense of insecurity.
Particularly
,
some
pieces of information can
be distorted
and turn misleading.
Hence
, it
makes
readers feel confused or over-worried about their regular
activities
.
For instance
, a piece of misleading information about the harmful effects of eating tomatoes and eggs together.

From the
abovementioned
practical concerns, the media should
obviously
restrict
bad
news
. The
first
reason is promoting economic growth. It
makes
people
less worried about possible
dangers
around them.
Therefore
, it
also
tends to engage in more social
activities
.
Moreover
, the consumption demand increases, which will give a boost to production
activities
and the whole country’s economy. The
next
reason is reducing the levels of
stress
when joining daily
activities
.
In addition
,
people
don’t aware of the
dangers
in their surroundings.
Thus
, they feel more active and optimistic.
As a result
, it
helps
lower the chances of getting
stressed
or even depressed when they try to immerse themselves in their normal
activities
, which
helps
them
fully
experience their life.

Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that
negative
information is harmful to the audiences.
Therefore
,
bad
news
should
be restricted
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think the media should reduce the amount of bad news that they publish because it might discourage people from joining normal activities that involve very little risk.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
320 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts