Presence of zoos has frequently sparked controversy among general public, debating upon a single topic that whether zoos are too cruel for animals or they are a medium for their protection. Difference between people has made them to view their own opinions from different angles creating these two sides.
One side of the population argues that the zoos are too cruel for animals to exist. The core reason for this statement is, animals are free-spirited beings which relies and remains content in their natural habitat unlike those artificially created settlement that zoos prepare for the animals which is not their natural habitat because they are given very little space to move around. This results to hindrance to their growth and diminishing natural instinct. For instance, investigation records that, a tiger that has been brought up inside zoos cage for its whole life are relatively weaker and cannot adapt properly in an unknown territory in wild to survive in the wild inevitably, leading to its demise.
Whereas, remaining people participating in this heated discussion states that zoo is acting as a protection area for wild animals. The underlying cause arousing this saying is the tightly guarded zoos. This is because, zoos are very precious and the animals contained inside even more because of which, many security measures are kept in place to ensure their security especially; endangered wild animals. To illustrate, Red Panda which was listed in endangered animals list back in 2017 A. D. , is soon to be erased from the list as government has been able to successfully breed them rapidly increasing its number up to astonishing 50, 000 with the help of zoo.
To conclude, none of the sides outbalance each other in any aspects however, in my opinion, even for providing protection, more friendly ways must be executed then only, zoos can be more of a savior than prison for animals.
Presence of zoos has
frequently
sparked controversy among
general public
, debating upon a single topic that whether zoos are too cruel for
animals or
they are a medium for their protection. Difference between
people
has
made them to view their
own
opinions from
different
angles creating these two sides.
One side of the population argues that the zoos are too cruel for
animals
to exist. The core reason for this statement is,
animals
are free-spirited beings which
relies
and remains content in their natural habitat unlike those
artificially
created settlement that zoos prepare for the
animals
which is not their natural habitat
because
they are
given
very
little
space to
move
around. This results to hindrance to their growth and diminishing natural instinct.
For instance
, investigation records that, a tiger that has
been brought
up inside zoos cage for its whole life are
relatively
weaker and cannot adapt
properly
in an unknown territory in wild to survive in the wild
inevitably
, leading to its demise.
Whereas, remaining
people
participating in this heated discussion states that zoo is acting as a protection area for wild
animals
. The underlying cause arousing this saying is the
tightly
guarded zoos. This is
because
, zoos are
very
precious and the
animals
contained inside even more
because
of which,
many
security measures are
kept
in place to ensure their security
especially
; endangered wild
animals
. To illustrate, Red Panda which
was listed
in endangered
animals
list back in 2017 A. D.
,
is
soon
to
be erased
from the list as
government
has been able to
successfully
breed them
rapidly
increasing its number up to astonishing 50, 000 with the
help
of zoo.
To conclude
, none of the sides outbalance each other in any aspects
however
, in my opinion, even for providing protection, more friendly ways
must
be executed
then
only
, zoos can be more of a savior than prison for
animals
.