Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. It has profoundly been debated that some people believe that candidate who are creative and having ability to work independently are preferred by employers, while others think that people who are able to work collaboratively with a group and pursue the guidelines. There are valid opinions on both sides of this intensely debated topic and I will ponder them now. On the first side of the argument, I understand why certain individuals believe that being innovative and working individually are demanding abilities by some companies. The foremost point to depict is that such kind of companies are generally related to works which obligate to be innovative. In other words, employees who work to make up a program or

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. It has profoundly been debated that some people believe that candidate who are creative and having ability to work independently are preferred by employers, while others think that people who are able to work collaboratively with a group and pursue the guidelines. There are valid opinions on both sides of this intensely debated topic and I will ponder them now. On the first side of the argument, I understand why certain individuals believe that being innovative and working individually are demanding abilities by some companies. The foremost point to depict is that such kind of companies are generally related to works which obligate to be innovative. In other words, employees who work to make up a program or l6QQ
It has profoundly been debated that some people believe that candidate who are creative and having ability to work independently are preferred by employers, while others think that people who are able to work collaboratively with a group and pursue the guidelines. There are valid opinions on both sides of this intensely debated topic and I will ponder them now. On the first side of the argument, I understand why certain individuals believe that being innovative and working individually are demanding abilities by some companies. The foremost point to depict is that such kind of companies are generally related to works which obligate to be innovative. In other words, employees who work to make up a program or a building project need to be creative. Irrespective of the above-mentioned sentiment, some people feel that skillful employee who work with team collectively and following guidelines will be able to more benefits to organisations. To be more specific, this kind of candidates seems more advantageous to employers, and mostly these individuals can work in companies. For instance, creating advertisement theme requires a team with various inputs of ideas, discussions, and collaborative effect working under the guidelines given by client. In my opinion, making choice between people who are innovative or able to work in a team depends on the nature of work. If the work is more technical and requires working independently and creatively then it is best to hire people who are self-sufficient and innovative. However, ability working together is better for other works such as demanding working collectively and instructing work. By way of conclusion, this essay discussed both the contrasting views regarding the consideration of an independent candidate, or a team player and it agreed that for maximum utilization of resources and quality work delivery, employers should hire candidates based on the work requirements.
It has
profoundly
been debated
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are creative and having ability to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
independently
are preferred
by employers, while others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
collaboratively
with a group and pursue the guidelines. There are valid opinions on both sides of this
intensely
debated topic and I will ponder them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
.

On the
first
side of the argument, I understand why certain individuals believe that being
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
innovative
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
individually
are demanding abilities by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
. The foremost point to depict is that such kind of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
are
generally
related to works which obligate to be
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
innovative
.
In other words
, employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
up a program or a building project need to be creative.

Irrespective of the above-mentioned sentiment,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
feel that skillful employee
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
collectively
and following guidelines will be able to more benefits to
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisations' is British English.
organisations
. To be more specific, this kind of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
seems more advantageous to employers, and
mostly
these individuals can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
.
For instance
, creating advertisement theme requires a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
with various inputs of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
, discussions, and collaborative effect
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
under the guidelines
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
by client.

In my opinion, making choice between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
innovative
or able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
depends on the nature of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
. If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
is more technical and requires
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
independently
and
creatively
Did you mean "than"?
then
it is best to hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are self-sufficient and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
innovative
.
However
, ability
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
together is better for other works such as demanding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
collectively
and instructing work.

By way of conclusion, this essay discussed both the contrasting views regarding the consideration of an independent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
, or a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
player and it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agreed
that for maximum utilization of resources and quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
delivery, employers should hire
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
based on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
requirements.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. It has profoundly been debated that some people believe that candidate who are creative and having ability to work independently are preferred by employers, while others think that people who are able to work collaboratively with a group and pursue the guidelines. There are valid opinions on both sides of this intensely debated topic and I will ponder them now. On the first side of the argument, I understand why certain individuals believe that being innovative and working individually are demanding abilities by some companies. The foremost point to depict is that such kind of companies are generally related to works which obligate to be innovative. In other words, employees who work to make up a program or

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
305 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts