Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some People think that using animals for food and transportation should be completely banned. On the other hand, other people believe that using animals for meat and experiments is fair. 2
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines. On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research. On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned. In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed
It is true that medicines and other products are
routinely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
they
are cleared
for human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
. While I tend towards the

viewpoint that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing is
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
, I would
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
support a limited amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimentation
for the development of medicines.

On the one hand, there are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
ethical arguments against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimentation
. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
a common example of this practice, laboratory

mice may be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
an illness
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that the effectiveness of a new drug can
be measured
. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no

right to subject
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
to this kind of trauma, and that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of all creatures should
be respected
. They believe that the benefits to humans

do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
alternative methods of research.

On the other hand
, reliable alternatives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimentation
may

not always be available. Supporters of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in medical

research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can
be justified
if human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
are saved
. They argue that opponents

of such research might feel
differently
if a member of their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
families needed a medical treatment that had
been developed
through the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of

animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimentation
.
Personally
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the banning of animal

testing for non-medical products,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures
are concerned
.

In conclusion
, it seems to me that it would be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to ban testing on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for vital medical research until
equally
effective alternatives have

been developed
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad
Show Comments
Language is not a genetic gift, it is a social gift. Learning a new language is becoming a member of the club – the community of speakers of that language.
Frank Smith

IELTS essay Medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
268 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts