Owing to the surge in science and technology, scientists have made significant advancements in the field of medicine. For this, some people believe that scientists should be allowed to check the effectiveness of their research on mammals; however, in my opinion, it is not only against the humanitarian values but also affects the ecosystem.
To begin with, those who favour experimentation on animals assert that this is the safest and most effective approach. To elaborate, the medicines developed for lethal diseases such as cancer, aids, tumour, and polio requires practical analysis before its implementation as they can have a serious impact on humans if they are directly used on the. As a result, mammals such as rats, lizards, snakes and insects are used for identifying any lethal effects of the research. Taking the example of the Polio vaccine, it was first tested on rat and then provided for the usage of humans. Thus, this approach is supported in the sense that with this experiment on one mammal can save the lives of million others.
On the other hand, I along with others oppose this trend as it is against mankind values and tends to disturb the food chain of the ecosystem. This is because each living being plays a quintessential role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem; therefore, if damage occurs, then it will adversely affect the diversity of the environment. Also, there are multiple other ways, such as artificial intelligence, robotic technology that can be used to analyse the effectiveness of medical research. To illustrate, in the USA scientists tested the drug developed for curing cancer with the help of artificial intelligence.
In conclusion, although experimentation on animals is regarding safe and an effective measure, in my perspective, it is detrimental both for humans and the ecosystem.
Owing to the surge in science and technology, scientists have made significant advancements in the field of medicine. For this,
some
people
believe that scientists should be
allowed
to
check
the effectiveness of their research on mammals;
however
, in my opinion, it is not
only
against the humanitarian values
but
also
affects the ecosystem.
To
begin
with, those who
favour
experimentation on animals assert that this is the safest and most effective approach. To elaborate, the medicines developed for lethal diseases such as cancer, aids,
tumour
, and polio requires practical analysis
before
its implementation as they can have a serious impact on humans if they are
directly
used
on
the.
As a result
, mammals such as rats, lizards, snakes and insects are
used
for identifying any lethal effects of the research. Taking the example of the Polio vaccine, it was
first
tested
on rat and then provided for the usage of humans.
Thus
, this approach
is supported
in the sense that with this experiment on one mammal can save the
lives
of million others.
On the other hand
, I along with others oppose this trend as it is against mankind values and tends to disturb the food chain of the ecosystem. This is
because
each living being plays a quintessential role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem;
therefore
, if damage occurs, then it will
adversely
affect the diversity of the environment.
Also
, there are multiple other ways, such as artificial intelligence, robotic technology that can be
used
to
analyse
the effectiveness of medical research. To illustrate, in the USA scientists
tested
the drug developed for curing cancer with the
help
of artificial intelligence.
In conclusion
, although experimentation on animals is regarding safe and an effective measure, in my perspective, it is detrimental both for humans and the ecosystem.