The level of education has been increased since the industrial revolution; thus, the competition for finding an appropriate job rise between graduates. Some experts claim that university professors should teach workplace skills to help students find a promising career. Numerous others suggest that knowledge proliferation is the universities' major aim, whether this information is helpful in the workplace or not. I will elaborate on both of these viewpoints, even though I share the latter view.
On the one hand, large groups of academic scientists assert that universities are the place for students who love to know more about science. As a result, the goal of the universities is to teach them all the aspects of the knowledge, although it's useless out of the university. This group believes that if students learn about all parts of science, innovations, and developments would occur. The pupils have a better perspective about their field when they have access to knowledge without censorship to identify their interests in their area.
On the other hand, some people opine that universities' primary function is to teach students what they need in the workplace and prepare them to find the best job opportunities. Consequently, teaching the basics of science is pointless because, in the workplace, other skills are needed. So, the universities should authorize their curriculum the skills improvement to help students become more qualified.
Having manifested the aforementioned points of view, many academic persons consist of teaching all courses, regardless of whether they are useful in the workplace or not since the innovation takes place when the innovator knows all the aspects of the science. The others think that the main features of the universities make students ready for work. I think the first viewpoint is accurate, and students can learn various skills on their own and tutor should teach all course to extend pupils perspective about their filed.
The level of education has
been increased
since the industrial revolution;
thus
, the competition for finding an appropriate job rise between graduates.
Some
experts claim that
university
professors should
teach
workplace
skills
to
help
students
find a promising career. Numerous others suggest that knowledge proliferation is the universities' major aim, whether this information is helpful in the
workplace
or not. I will elaborate on both of these viewpoints,
even though
I share the latter view.
On the one hand, large groups of academic scientists assert that
universities
are the place for
students
who
love
to know more about
science
.
As a result
, the goal of the
universities
is to
teach
them all the aspects of the knowledge, although it's useless out of the
university
. This group believes that if
students
learn about all parts of
science
, innovations, and developments would occur. The pupils have a better perspective about their field when they have access to knowledge without censorship to identify their interests in their area.
On the
other
hand,
some
people
opine that universities' primary function is to
teach
students
what they need in the
workplace
and prepare them to find the best job opportunities.
Consequently
, teaching the basics of
science
is pointless
because
, in the
workplace
,
other
skills
are needed
.
So
, the
universities
should authorize their curriculum the
skills
improvement to
help
students
become more qualified.
Having manifested the aforementioned points of view,
many
academic persons consist of teaching all courses, regardless of whether they are useful in the
workplace
or not since the innovation takes place when the innovator knows all the aspects of the
science
. The others
think
that the main features of the
universities
make
students
ready for work. I
think
the
first
viewpoint is accurate, and
students
can learn various
skills
on their
own
and tutor should
teach
all course to extend pupils perspective about their filed.