Technology is regarded as cradle of various entertainment means. A rapid rise in TV channels has been observed in contemporary times. A section of society argues that it is beneficial as there will be more alternatives, whereas a certain class thinks it hampers the worth of shows. In this essay, I will discuss both the sides of the given argument and will reach to an appropriate conclusion.
A group favours multiple programs primarily because of the range it offers. With increased number, the variety of genre is available which interest individuals. Often, the liking for anything differs from person to person, so everyone can benefit with type of shows they like. To illustrate, Zee TV, a famous Indian entertainment channel, maintained highest TRP for consecutive 5 years as the shows involved categories like crime, food, movies and songs.
On the contrary, there are people who think the value of programs decline if they are in bulk. Foremost, in order to provide multiple shows, there is a compulsion on TV producers. Consequently they come up with any type of show which might not be appealing but just for the sake. For example, currently, people prefer to watch TV only on specific time for a particular show which they like as they do not find every program interesting.
To conclude, although both the sides have their own intrinsic worth, I think having limited but meaningful programs are more appropriate than just having them for the sake of having them. Such programs are meant for the entertainment of individuals, if they do not fulfil that objective then it is of no use.
Technology
is regarded
as cradle of various entertainment means. A rapid rise in TV channels has
been observed
in contemporary times. A section of society argues that it is beneficial as there will be more alternatives, whereas a certain
class
thinks
it hampers the worth of
shows
. In this essay, I will discuss both the sides of the
given
argument and will reach to an appropriate conclusion.
A group
favours
multiple
programs
primarily
because
of the range it offers. With increased number, the variety of genre is available which interest individuals.
Often
, the liking for anything differs from person to person,
so
everyone can benefit with type of
shows
they like. To illustrate,
Zee
TV, a
famous
Indian entertainment channel, maintained highest TRP for consecutive 5 years as the
shows
involved categories like crime, food, movies and songs.
On the contrary
, there are
people
who
think
the value of
programs
decline if they are in bulk. Foremost, in order to provide multiple
shows
, there is a compulsion on TV producers.
Consequently
they
come
up with any type of
show
which might not be appealing
but
just
for the sake.
For example
,
currently
,
people
prefer to
watch
TV
only
on specific time for a particular
show
which they like as they do not find every
program
interesting.
To conclude
, although both the sides have their
own
intrinsic worth, I
think
having limited
but
meaningful
programs
are more appropriate than
just
having them for the sake of having them. Such
programs
are meant
for the entertainment of individuals, if they do not fulfil that objective then it is of no
use
.