In recent years, some people hold the idea that new houses should be built in the traditional style, while others prefer to think that the local authorities should allow people to build houses based on their own choices and ideas. There are numerous aspects to both arguments and this essay will discuss the possible reasons with examples that support each view.
On the one hand, the people who support the traditional way of building the construction are those who hold a sense of equality in mind and want to establish harmony and uniformity among the people who live on the premise. In addition to that, they encourage conventional models of buildings to keep the heritage alive and to enrich their culture. For example, Kalpathy, a heritage village in Kerala, has strict rules that the inhabitants should build houses in the traditional Agrahara style to preserve their legacy. This has provided aesthetic beauty, which captures high tourist attraction, to the entire village. Moreover, the uniqueness of the village has increased the personal relations within the natives along with peaceful living conditions.
On the other hand, regardless of the above argument, other people choose to believe that personal freedom and choices have their importance on people’s lives in the modern world. Most importantly, the uniqueness and individuality of the construction depict the personality of the house owner. While allowing people to build houses by their own choices helps them to create innovative accommodation with all the available facilities can control the damages caused by future climatic changes. For instance, people can build houses in pillars that allow water to flow easily under the basement to overcome the loss caused by heavy floods. Furthermore, it is significant to mention that the people would be able to build houses according to their income, required amenities, infrastructure and so on. Therefore, it is evident that personal freedom is a notable argument among this.
In conclusion, both the arguments have their aspects and it seems to me that the second argument is the most suitable one in a contemporary world where people give priorities to personal choices than the conventional way of thinking.
In recent years,
some
people
hold the
idea
that new
houses
should
be built
in the traditional style, while others prefer to
think
that the local authorities should
allow
people
to
build
houses
based on their
own
choices
and
ideas
. There are numerous aspects to both
arguments
and this essay will discuss the possible reasons with examples that support each view.
On the one hand, the
people
who support the traditional way of building the construction are those who hold a sense of equality in mind and want to establish harmony and uniformity among the
people
who
live
on the premise.
In addition
to that, they encourage conventional models of buildings to
keep
the heritage alive and to enrich their culture.
For example
,
Kalpathy
, a heritage village in Kerala, has strict
rules
that the inhabitants should
build
houses
in the traditional
Agrahara
style to preserve their legacy. This has provided aesthetic beauty, which captures high tourist attraction, to the entire village.
Moreover
, the uniqueness of the village has increased the
personal
relations within the natives along with peaceful living conditions.
On the other hand
, regardless of the above
argument
, other
people
choose to believe that
personal
freedom and
choices
have their importance on
people’s
lives
in the modern world. Most
importantly
, the uniqueness and individuality of the construction depict the personality of the
house
owner.
While
allowing
people
to
build
houses
by their
own
choices
helps
them to create innovative accommodation with all the available facilities can control the damages caused by future climatic
changes
.
For instance
,
people
can
build
houses
in pillars that
allow
water to flow
easily
under the basement to overcome the loss caused by heavy floods.
Furthermore
, it is significant to mention that the
people
would be able to
build
houses
according to their income, required amenities, infrastructure and
so
on.
Therefore
, it is evident that
personal
freedom is a notable
argument
among this.
In conclusion
, both the
arguments
have their aspects and it seems to me that the second
argument
is the most suitable one in a contemporary world where
people
give priorities to
personal
choices
than the conventional way of thinking.