In recent years, some people support the opinion that free education should be provided by the government at every level of education, while others prefer to think that aspirants should accommodate the tuition fees of their higher education. There are numerous aspects to both arguments and this essay will examine the possible reasons with examples that support each view.
On the one hand, the people who support the free education system are those who hold a sense of equality in mind and they are considering education as a basic right of the citizens in the country. In addition to that, they often thought that higher education is the backbone of a country to develop its human resources which gradually contributes a huge share to the nation’s growth in terms of a productive workforce. For instance, India's rank in the Human Development Index was 153 in 1990, where only 20% of the young population was enrolled for university education. But it has increased to 98th position in 2016, where about 80% of the youngsters are having higher education in the country.
On the other hand, it is often believed that providing free education would create a tremendous financial burden on the government. Moreover, subsidising higher education directly connected with the quality of the education provided in the country. For example, if a developing country makes higher education free of cost, then the private players will not be involved in that sector. It, later on, resulted in inefficient management of the fund and negatively influence the quality of the courses.
In conclusion, although the removal of the fees imposed on university education does help the aspirants, I strongly believe that the individuals should pay the cost of their higher education instead of imposing additional expenditure on the government’s exchequer.
In recent years,
some
people
support the opinion that
free
education
should
be provided
by the
government
at every level of
education
, while others prefer to
think
that aspirants should accommodate the tuition fees of their higher
education
. There are numerous aspects to both arguments and this essay will examine the possible reasons with examples that support each view.
On the one hand, the
people
who support the
free
education
system are those who hold a sense of equality in
mind and
they are considering
education
as a basic right of the citizens in the
country
.
In addition
to that, they
often
thought
that higher
education
is the backbone of a
country
to develop its human resources which
gradually
contributes a huge share to the nation’s growth in terms of a productive workforce.
For instance
, India's rank in the Human Development Index was 153 in 1990, where
only
20% of the young population
was enrolled
for university
education
.
But
it has increased to 98th position in 2016, where about 80% of the youngsters are having higher
education
in the country.
On the other hand
, it is
often
believed that providing
free
education
would create a tremendous financial burden on the
government
.
Moreover
,
subsidising
higher
education
directly
connected with the quality of the
education
provided in the
country
.
For example
, if a developing
country
makes
higher
education
free
of cost, then the private players will not
be involved
in that sector. It, later on, resulted in inefficient management of the fund and
negatively
influence the quality of the courses.
In conclusion
, although the removal of the fees imposed on university
education
does
help
the aspirants, I
strongly
believe that the individuals should pay the cost of their higher
education
instead
of imposing additional expenditure on the
government
’s exchequer.