Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Q: Some people feel that the responsibility for providing education should be borne only by the government and that private education should be banned .To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

Q: Some people feel that the responsibility for providing education should be borne only by the government and that private education should be banned. with this statement. JoLE0
In this day & age, people are paying attention to the issue of supporting educational duty. As a consequence, there has been, in recent years a growing body of taking obligation for education by the government. I, to the fullest extent, subscribe to this notion and will go deep into the matter before drawing a conclusion. Taking obligation for education by the government is considered to have a paramount influence on poor students. In other words, it is undeniable that every students can not go to private educational institutions this is becauss of the fact that personal schools or colleges are quite expensive rather than government institutions, so if government accept all expenditures for stydying, which will be highly contributed to the betterment on poor students, who are belonging to hand to mouth family. Aside of it individuals education should banned to remove discrimination between rich & poor students. Research conducted by the UNICEF reveals that due to private sectors, some poor students become reluctant to continue their study, thus the percentage of education will be declining, in that case government should take strict strides to set proper education. Therefore, in an effort to ensure education for all, private institutions should not allow. Besides, taking obligation for education by government exerts a significant sway on improvement their country. To be more precise, if governments become concern about education, it will help to reduce illiterate, for that their countries will be more beneficial because it is universal truth that without education no one country who who can progress. In fact educated people are the biggest asset for any country. In this context suffice, it to say is that, there are many students who think that private education provides high standar teaching methodology, and after completing their graduation they are able to establish their career within a very short time, so the students of government institutions lost their interest to go to their places, but it can be removed by the authority of government, they will provide standard education with stopping private sectors. A study reveals that people of developed countries do study of their governments institutions, they do not want to study at private sectors, thus they has become developed countries in the era. As a result, by expelling private sectors, government should take liability of all students in a good way that undoubtedly will help to see their country as a developed nation. In essence, having thoroughly analysed the pros and cons of taking obligation for education by the government, it has to avowed that the significance of it is indeterminable. Hence, except for a person with a tendency to nurture an unwise decision, anyone would support my standpoint, for the arguments mentioned above leave no scope for further debate.
In this day & age,
people
are paying attention to the issue of supporting educational duty. As a consequence, there has been, in recent years a growing body of taking
obligation
for
education
by the
government
. I, to the fullest extent, subscribe to this notion and will go deep into the matter
before
drawing a conclusion.

Taking
obligation
for
education
by the
government
is considered
to have a paramount influence on
poor
students
.
In other words
, it is undeniable that every
students
can not go to
private
educational institutions this is
becauss
of the fact that personal schools or colleges are quite expensive
rather
than
government
institutions,
so
if
government
accept all expenditures for
stydying
, which will be
highly
contributed to the betterment on
poor
students
,
who
are belonging
to hand to mouth family. Aside of
it individuals
education
should
banned
to remove discrimination between rich &
poor
students
. Research conducted by the UNICEF reveals that due to
private
sectors
,
some
poor
students
become reluctant to continue their
study
,
thus
the percentage of
education
will be declining,
in that case
government
should take strict strides to set proper
education
.
Therefore
, in an effort to ensure
education
for all,
private
institutions should not
allow
.

Besides
, taking
obligation
for
education
by
government
exerts a significant sway on improvement their
country
. To be more precise, if
governments
become concern about
education
, it will
help
to
reduce
illiterate, for that their
countries
will be more beneficial
because
it is universal truth that without
education
no one
country
who
who
can progress. In fact educated
people
are the biggest asset for any
country
. In this context suffice, it to say is that, there are
many
students
who
think
that
private
education
provides high
standar
teaching methodology, and after completing their graduation they are able to establish their career within a
very
short time,
so
the
students
of
government
institutions lost their interest to go to their places,
but
it can
be removed
by the authority of
government
, they will provide standard
education
with stopping
private
sectors
. A
study
reveals that
people
of developed
countries
do
study
of their
governments
institutions, they do not want to
study
at
private
sectors
,
thus
they
has
become developed
countries
in the era.
As a result
, by expelling
private
sectors
,
government
should take liability of all
students
in a
good
way
that


undoubtedly
will
help
to
see
their
country
as a developed nation.

In essence, having
thoroughly
analysed
the pros and cons of taking
obligation
for
education
by the
government
, it
has to
avowed that the significance of it is indeterminable.
Hence
,
except for
a person with a tendency to nurture an unwise decision, anyone would support my standpoint, for the arguments mentioned above
leave
no scope for
further
debate.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Q: Some people feel that the responsibility for providing education should be borne only by the government and that private education should be banned. with this statement.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
460 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts