Art reflects the heritage of the country and the creativity of an individual. While some believe that allocating budget to arts by the government is a waste of wealth because they feel there are many important issues to resolve first before putting emphasize to art. I am of the opposite view as I completely believe that financing in art is a good idea for the government.
There are some justifications by the people who oppose spending on promoting the arts. First of all, available monetary resources could be put to use in building more schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. More hospitals assure increased care of sick people and improve health index of the country. Likewise, schools promote the literacy rate of the country. For example, the disease of tuberculosis continues to affect thousands of health even today. If the government has diverted some of the funds in arts to these areas, India would have a stronger young generation. Moreover, they believe art is not a critical factor for human sustainability.
However, I still support that the government should allocate budget for the arts. Art is the part of the culture which become the identity of the nation if the culture is strong enough, eventually, it becomes a major source of income. For example, Bali is an island in Indonesia, where millions of visitors come every year to experience the combination of conventional values and modern lifestyle. The government of India allocates more than a third of their budget on traditional art. Furthermore, art makes life more beautiful. Just imagine how empty the room would be if there is no painting on the wall! It also empowers people to possess beautiful imagination
To conclude, supporting art is important for the government as it would enhance the quality of life by improving the tourism industry, tourism in turns generates employment and revenue to the country.
Art
reflects the heritage of the
country
and the creativity of an individual. While
some
believe that allocating budget to
arts
by the
government
is a waste of wealth
because
they feel there are
many
important
issues to resolve
first
before
putting emphasize to
art
. I am of the opposite view as I completely believe that financing in
art
is a
good
idea
for the
government
.
There are
some
justifications by the
people
who oppose spending on promoting the
arts
.
First of all
, available monetary resources could
be put
to
use
in building more schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. More hospitals assure increased care of sick
people
and
improve
health index of the
country
.
Likewise
, schools promote the literacy rate of the
country
.
For example
, the disease of tuberculosis continues to affect thousands of health even
today
. If the
government
has diverted
some of the
funds in
arts
to these areas, India would have a stronger young generation.
Moreover
, they believe
art
is not a critical factor for human sustainability.
However
, I
still
support that the
government
should allocate budget for the
arts
.
Art
is the part of the culture which become the identity of the nation if the culture is strong
enough
,
eventually
, it becomes a major source of income.
For example
, Bali is an island in Indonesia, where millions of visitors
come
every year to experience the combination of conventional values and modern lifestyle. The
government
of India allocates more than a third of their budget on traditional
art
.
Furthermore
,
art
makes
life more
beautiful
.
Just
imagine how empty the room would be if there is no painting on the wall! It
also
empowers
people
to possess
beautiful
imagination
To conclude
, supporting
art
is
important
for the
government
as it would enhance the quality of life by improving the tourism industry, tourism in turns generates employment and revenue to the
country
.