Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spend elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere v. 8
A lot of people cannot grasp the meaning of art for the society, therefore they consider it not to be extremely important. Having contemplated all pros and cons of spending money on the arts for a while, I have deduced that it is doubtedly a waste of the country's budget. First of all, art is a vital part of children’s development. It helps to think out of the box and I consider this skill to be of high importance nowadays. In Ukraine most teachers think that Maths is the most essential subject. However, art classes broaden children’s minds as much as Maths does. It can take us to different eras, countries, realities, therefore it can teach us history, culture, and to think creatively. Secondly, art develops the economy. I am a fan of TED Talks and I have listened to the podcast about creative industries in Ethiopia recently. A woman from the podcast, who is an Ethiopian-American film producer and writer, narrated her life story and said that creative industries help the economy thrive. It provides society with a myriad of workplaces that is essential even in well-developed countries. Also it gives people a lot of life-changing opportunities. That woman said that a great deal of new businessmen account for those employees that started in creative industries. This results in opening even more workplaces. In addition, these down-to-earth humans, who suggest that the government should not spend money on the arts, should unquestionably read “The Goldfinch” by Donna Tartt. This book, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2014, tells us about the strong bond between person and art. A boy Teodor and a masterpiece by Fabricius are in the centre of the plot and the author shows us how one painting can bring us back to life. All in all, the government should certainly continue to invest money in the art industry and the society should not underestimate the value and power of art. As one Latin philosopher said: “Ars longa, vita brevis”, that can be translated as “Art is long, life is short. ”
A lot of
people
cannot grasp the meaning of
art
for the society,
therefore
they consider it not to be
extremely
important
. Having contemplated all pros and cons of spending money on the
arts
for a while, I have deduced that it is
doubtedly
a waste of the country's budget.

First of all
,
art
is a vital part of children’s development. It
helps
to
think
out of the box and I consider this
skill
to be of high importance nowadays. In Ukraine most teachers
think
that
Maths
is the most essential subject.
However
,
art
classes broaden children’s minds as much as
Maths
does. It can take us to
different
eras, countries, realities,
therefore
it can teach us history, culture, and to
think
creatively
.

Secondly
,
art
develops the economy. I am a fan of TED Talks and I have listened to the podcast about creative
industries
in Ethiopia recently. A woman from the podcast, who is an Ethiopian-American film producer and writer, narrated her life story and said that creative
industries
help
the economy thrive. It provides society with a myriad of workplaces
that is
essential even in well-
developed countries
.
Also
it gives
people
a lot of
life-changing opportunities. That woman said that a great deal of new businessmen account for those employees that
started
in creative
industries
. This results in opening even more workplaces.

In addition
, these down-to-earth humans, who suggest that the
government
should not spend money on the
arts
, should
unquestionably
read “The Goldfinch” by Donna
Tartt
. This book, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2014,
tells
us about the strong bond between person and
art
. A boy
Teodor
and a masterpiece by
Fabricius
are in the
centre
of the plot and the author
shows
us how one painting can bring us back to life.

All in all, the
government
should
certainly
continue to invest money in the
art
industry
and the society should not underestimate the value and power of
art
. As one Latin philosopher said: “
Ars
longa
, vita
brevis
”, that can
be translated
as
“Art
is long, life is short. ”
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spend elsewhere.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
344 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts