To reduce the commuting time to workplace, some people consider that parks and gardens in proximity to the city centres should be converted into apartments. I believe that such a change would not reduce the travelling time and on the contrary would create more problems.
There are many reasons why I believe that replacing parks with apartment buildings would not reduce the travelling time. Firstly, the main reason for long travelling times is not the long distances but actually traffic congestion. This is due to increasing number of cars on the road and building apartments near to city centres would worsen the situation by adding even more cars on the road. Secondly, many people like to live far away because of the noise and overcrowding near the city centres and building new apartments would increase this problem even more. In other words, it would be very hard to convince people to move into such apartments.
Moreover, taking such a drastic step would bring its own set of problems. To begin with, removing trees in parks and gardens would lead to air pollution, which can increase the risk of certain cancers and have adverse effects on children, the elderly and anyone with underlying respiratory problems. The lack of parks and gardens would further exacerbate such problems. Last but not least, parks provide space for neighbourhood residents to interact with each other meet new people. They are also great places for events and for people to engage in recreational activities. This allows people to develop a sense of community. Hence, converting parks into apartments would adversely impact people's quality of life and their sense of community.
In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that although I agree that travelling times need to be reduced, converting parks and gardens in the city centres would not be a step in the right direction.
To
reduce
the commuting
time
to workplace,
some
people
consider that
parks
and
gardens
in proximity to the city
centres
should
be converted
into
apartments
. I believe that such a
change
would not
reduce
the
travelling
time
and
on the contrary
would create more problems.
There are
many
reasons why I believe that replacing
parks
with
apartment
buildings would not
reduce
the
travelling
time
.
Firstly
, the main reason for long
travelling
times
is not the long distances
but
actually traffic congestion. This is due to increasing number of cars on the road and building
apartments
near to city
centres
would worsen the situation by adding even more cars on the road.
Secondly
,
many
people
like to
live
far away
because
of the noise and overcrowding near the city
centres
and building new
apartments
would increase this
problem
even more.
In other words
, it would be
very
hard
to convince
people
to
move
into such apartments.
Moreover
, taking such a drastic step would bring its
own
set of
problems
. To
begin
with, removing trees in
parks
and
gardens
would lead to air pollution, which can increase the
risk
of certain cancers and have adverse effects on children, the elderly and anyone with underlying respiratory
problems
. The lack of
parks
and
gardens
would
further
exacerbate such
problems
. Last
but
not least,
parks
provide space for
neighbourhood
residents to interact with each other
meet
new
people
. They are
also
great places for
events
and for
people
to engage in recreational activities. This
allows
people
to develop a sense of community.
Hence
, converting
parks
into
apartments
would
adversely
impact
people
's quality of life and their sense of community.
In conclusion
, I would like to reiterate that although I
agree
that
travelling
times
need to be
reduced
, converting
parks
and
gardens
in the city
centres
would not be a step in the right direction.