Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that the best jobs should be reserved for those with seniority. Other people think older workers should move over to make room for younger staff. Which view do you agree with?

Some people think that the best jobs should be reserved for those with seniority. Other people think older workers should move over to make room for younger staff. Which view do you agree with? b9KB

Job promotions have always been a topic of debate in office, most people think senior employees of the company should get the better job roles, while others believe that people in their youth should get chance for better job roles. In my opinion, the senior employees of the company has shown their work and loyalty towards the organization and deserves to get jobs booked for them. The competition for a job has increased a lot and people who have been working in the same place for a long time has proved their quality of work and commitment towards the company. An employee who has worked for a long time in an organization has proved his work over every year and knows in detail the structure and workflow of it. for instance, A member who joined in the initial days of the company when its valuation was less and stayed all the way for years seeing self growth and the growth of company. There are some major companies for which loyalty matters and staff who has been working for long has gained that trust. A worker who has spent most of his years working for one same company and hopes to retire deserves to be given some kind of special priority over other young employee’s. for example, uber in America promoted all the staff that had worked with them for 20 plus years in all the higher ranking jobs. In conclusion, in my opinion, I strongly believe jobs are supposed to be passed down based on their level of seniority in the company rather than keeping it for younger workers.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
Job
 promotions have always been a topic of debate in office, most This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 senior You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 the better You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
job
 roles, while others believe that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in their youth should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 chance for better You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
job
 roles. In my opinion, the senior You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employees
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 has shown their work and loyalty towards the organization and deserves to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
jobs
 booked for them.

The competition for a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
job
 has increased a lot and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 have been working in the same place for a long time has proved their quality of work and commitment towards the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
. An You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmemberlaborerclerkworkeragentrepresentative
employee
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 has worked for a long time in an organization has proved his work over every You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperiodbreadthtermmileagespandiameter
year
 and knows in detail the structure and workflow of it. for instance
, A member You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :consolidatedfused
joined
 in the initial days of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 when its valuation was less and stayed all the way for years seeing self growth and the growth of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
.

There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 major You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
companies
 for which loyalty matters and staff You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 has been working for long has gained that trust. A worker You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 has spent most of his years working for one same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
 and hopes to retire deserves to be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 kind of special priority over other young The possessive apostrophe seems to be incorrect. Please remove the apostrophe if you want to use the plural form of 'employee'.employees
employee’s
. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterFor
for
 example, Possible spelling mistake found.UberuserHubertuberBuberumber
uber
 in America promoted all the staff that had worked with them for 20 plus years in all the higher ranking jobs.

In conclusion
, in my opinion, I strongly
 believe You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskappointmentofficebusinesscareerassignment
jobs
are supposed
 to be passed
 down based on their level of seniority in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgroupclubcommunityteampartyassociation
company
rather
 than keeping it for younger workers. 