Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. D0G6
In current era of cut-throat competition to choose right candidate at right place is the biggest challenge for an employer. In such a scenario, While, hire some one in organization it is essential to emphasize on their the best qualities as well as over qualification is a prominent factor. However, more priority should be given on the requirement of skill sets according to the task to be perform is the most important factor behind hiring the right candidate. Thus, i am partially agree with the notion. This essay shall elaborate reasons for my inclination in ensuing paragraphs and draws logical conclusion in the end. To commence with, the first and the foremost important reason for hiring on the bases of the task to be perform seems to be that if, right candidate at right place hired he or she will do their job more accurately and trying their best to development of the company and their personal skills and abilities. For example, if the opening is for an accountant and an employer hire the candidate on the basis of higher qualification grades, higher work experience but, different field than commerce background it is meaning less as the candidate is not perform well on the task because he or she have different interest. Second of all, some jobs require candidates who are fresher as corporates preference is only cutting down the cost because of that job do not require any proficient skill-sets and higher qualifications as in that particular task candidate have to do silly routine data entry work which can be perform by even 8th grade pass candidate. Hence, if employer give more focus on recruitment pattern in which they hire only on the basis of higher education and personal qualities might be more costlier to the companies and corporates than any other recruitment pattern. Last but not the least, companies and corporates cannot able to pick the talent who have higher experience good personal qualities which is suitable for achieving task and targets but do not have right qualification as corporates and organizations giving priorities to the only personal qualities and qualifications. Paradoxically, in certain field like medical, law, and research in which educational qualification and personal qualities must essential when hire some one. As, these profession career field require the people who are having profound knowledge of subject in academics and practical exposure so that in future if any discrepancy may occur it should be avoid conveniently. If, on the top position corporates appoint the candidate who is not have proper qualifications and qualities might be have an adverse impact on companies growth and society. Thus, recruitment in the field which require professional skill must be based on qualification and personal qualities as well work experience. I, concede that both the paragraphs have significant importance and logic; however, in my view recruit ment must be based on the task to be performed so that ultimate goal of companies and employees can be achieve without any problems. In conclusion, by analyzing aforementioned points it is aptly clear that when the companies and corporates hire employee at that time focus on type of requirements of company should be given priority rather than education qualifications and personal qualities and experience.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
era of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cut
-throat competition to choose
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
place is the biggest challenge for an employer. In such a scenario, While,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
Did you mean "someone"?
some one
in organization it is essential to emphasize on their the best
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
as well
as over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualification
is a prominent factor.
However
, more priority should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
on the requirement of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skill
sets according to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
to be
Consider using a past participle here: "performed".
perform
is the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
factor behind hiring the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
.
Thus
,
Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.
i
am
partially
Consider using a past participle here: "agreed".
agree
with the notion. This essay shall elaborate reasons for my inclination in ensuing paragraphs and draws logical conclusion in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
.

To commence with, the
first
and the foremost
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
reason for hiring on the bases of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
to be
Consider using a past participle here: "performed".
perform
seems to be that if,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
place hired he or she will do their job more
accurately
and trying their best to development of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
and their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
and abilities.
For example
, if the opening is for an accountant and an employer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
on the basis of higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualification
grades, higher work experience
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
field
than commerce background it
The verb 'meaning' is a stative verb and sometimes the progressive form is not correct. Try a simple form instead.
is meaning
less
Comparison requires "than", not 'then' nor 'as'.
as
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
is not
Consider using a past participle here: "performed".
perform
well on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
he or she
The pronoun 'she' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "has", "had".
have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
interest. Second of all,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
jobs
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
require
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are fresher as
Possible spelling mistake found.
corporates
preference is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
cutting down the cost
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of that job do not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
require
any proficient
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skill
-sets and higher
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualifications
as in that particular
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
do silly routine data entry work which can be
Consider using the past participle "performed"?
perform
by even 8th grade pass
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
.
Hence
, if employer give more focus on recruitment pattern in which they
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
on the basis of higher education and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
might be
Use only "costlier" (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
more costlier
to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
corporates
than any other recruitment pattern. Last
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not the least,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and
Possible spelling mistake found.
corporates
Did you mean "cannot be able"?
cannot able
to pick the talent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
have higher experience
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
which is suitable for achieving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
and targets
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
do not have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualification
as
Possible spelling mistake found.
corporates
and organizations giving priorities to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
and qualifications.

Paradoxically
, in certain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
field
like medical, law, and research in which educational
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualification
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
essential when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
Did you mean "someone"?
some one
. As,
Did you mean "this profession" or "these professions"?
these profession
career
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
field
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
require
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are having profound knowledge of subject in academics and practical exposure
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that in future if any discrepancy may occur it should be
Consider using the past participle "avoided"?
avoid
conveniently
. If, on the top position
Possible spelling mistake found.
corporates
appoint the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
candidate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
is not
Consider using a past participle here: "had".
have
proper
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualifications
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
might be
Consider using the past participle "had"?
have
an adverse impact on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
growth and society.
Thus
, recruitment in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
field
which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
require
professional
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skill
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be based
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualification
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
as well
work experience.

I, concede that both the paragraphs have significant importance and logic;
however
, in my view recruit
Possible spelling mistake found.
ment
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be based
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
task
to
be performed
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that ultimate goal of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and employees can be
Consider using the past participle "achieved"?
achieve
without any problems.

In conclusion
, by analyzing aforementioned points it is
aptly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and corporates
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hire
employee at that time focus on type of requirements of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
priority
rather
than education
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualifications
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
qualities
and experience.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
539 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts