It is undeniable that giving awards to students have been regular practice in some demographics of societies. Whether children should be awarded to those who have stood good at academics or who have showed improvement is a contentious debate. Both the views are compared ahead.
It is thought by school that a number of children have done a lot of practice and hardwork prior to appear in exams. These sections of students represents great tenacity and preserverance in order to achieve well in academics. In other words, they tend to spend one-third of their quality time in self-study rather than learning new concepts at the classrooms. For instance, a study by Harvard University revealed that if the Indonesian schools had not bestowed schoolchildren with prizes and medals, then they would not have been maintained consistency in their studies.
However, few young people are not likely to get high level rank in education among the class while these students have made alterations in their method of approaching any questions. This can be explained that children may have analyze their past mistakes by intervening with class tutors or personal teacher. To cite an example, fundamental subjects, particularly mathematics have various ways and means to solve the prompts. By this approach, they have been adopting methods which is appropriate for them. This is owing to fact that changing habits in a potential way, schoolchildren will deserve the rewards. By praising students in this manner, their image would be bolstered, as well as a factor of motivation could be instilled that impossible task can also be accomplished.
In conclusion, although the pupils, who have secured good positions in respective classes, might be beneficial for them as they could seize opportunity to stand out again in the future, whereas children who have been gone through failures and upgrading themselves regularly would be entirely justifiable to receive awards.
It is undeniable that giving awards to
students
have been regular practice in
some
demographics of societies. Whether
children
should
be awarded
to those
who
have stood
good
at academics or
who
have
showed
improvement is a contentious debate. Both the views
are compared
ahead.
It is
thought
by school that a number of
children
have done
a lot of
practice and
hardwork
prior to appear in exams. These sections of
students
represents
great tenacity and
preserverance
in order to achieve well in academics.
In other words
, they tend to spend one-third of their quality time in self-study
rather
than learning new concepts at the classrooms.
For instance
, a study by Harvard University revealed that if the Indonesian schools had not bestowed schoolchildren with prizes and medals, then they would not have
been maintained
consistency in their studies.
However
, few young
people
are not likely to
get
high level rank in education among the
class
while these
students
have made alterations in their method of approaching any questions. This can be
explained
that
children
may have
analyze
their past mistakes by intervening with
class
tutors or personal teacher. To cite an example, fundamental subjects,
particularly
mathematics have various ways and means to solve the prompts. By this approach, they have been adopting methods which is appropriate for them. This is owing to fact that changing habits
in a potential way
, schoolchildren will deserve the rewards. By praising
students
in this manner, their image would
be bolstered
,
as well
as a factor of motivation could
be instilled
that impossible task can
also
be accomplished
.
In conclusion
, although the pupils,
who
have secured
good
positions in respective classes, might be beneficial for them as they could seize opportunity to stand out again in the future, whereas
children
who
have
been gone
through failures and upgrading themselves
regularly
would be
entirely
justifiable to receive awards.