People have divided views where some argue that they should privilege to consume water accordingly, where as opponents argue their should be restriction on water. I am also in the fa vour of laterview On the one hand people who agree that water is consume according to need because it is basic human necessity also consumption depends on area where people live for example in my locality people utilize water for various purposes including drinking, cleaning, preparing food as well as for domestic pets. However in cities consumption is less due to lack of domestic animals. therefore it is not justified to limit acess to water thus people will have to stay deprive for completing some of necessitiesOn the other hand there must be restriction on utilization of this because water is non -renewable source. Therefore once it has become extinct then it's regeneration will require uncountable years. Due to this government should apply legislation for reducing wastage of water where people deliberately or un deliberately do it, To ensure that need of every person is accomplishedIn my opinion, I think authorities must levy limit which makes it clear that water should be some for all rather than all for some for example, In Shimla whii is located in India. Where people have to confront many obstacles as tourist use limitless water for bathing and cleaning purposes only. In contrast people or residents of that area face problems for getting water for drinking even consequently this policy can make their lives bit easier To sum up, since food shetterand clothes are required for smooth living legislators implement restriction on water uses which is going to do more good than harm to society
People
have divided views where
some
argue that they should privilege to consume
water
accordingly
,
where as
opponents argue
their
should be restriction on
water
. I am
also
in the fa
vour
of
laterview
On the one hand
people
who
agree
that
water
is consume according to need
because
it is basic human necessity
also
consumption depends on area where
people
live
for example
in my locality
people
utilize
water
for various purposes including drinking, cleaning, preparing food
as well
as for domestic pets.
However
in cities consumption is less due to lack of domestic animals.
therefore
it is not justified to limit
acess
to
water
thus
people
will
have to
stay deprive for completing
some
of
necessitiesOn
the other hand there
must
be restriction on utilization of this
because
water
is non -renewable source.
Therefore
once it has become extinct then it's regeneration will require uncountable years. Due to this
government
should apply legislation for reducing wastage of
water
where
people
deliberately
or
un
deliberately
do it, To ensure that need of every person is
accomplishedIn
my opinion, I
think
authorities
must
levy limit which
makes
it
clear
that
water
should be
some
for all
rather
than all for
some
for example
, In
Shimla
whii
is located
in India. Where
people
have to
confront
many
obstacles as tourist
use
limitless
water
for bathing and cleaning purposes
only
. In
contrast
people
or residents of that area face problems for getting
water
for drinking even
consequently
this policy can
make
their
lives
bit easier To sum up, since food
shetterand
clothes
are required
for smooth living legislators implement restriction on
water
uses
which is going to do more
good
than harm to
society