Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that nuclear power plants are dangerous for the existence of living beings. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that nuclear power plants are dangerous for the existence of living beings. kgkAN

A faction of the populance, all around the world, undeniably, holds the notion that the nuclear power plants are life-threatening for the existence of the living organisms. This essay is in accordance with the given statement as there are manifold reasons to substantiate it. The atomic power plants emits a huge amount of radiation which causes multifarious diseases such as skin disorders, cancer, genetic mutations and so on. In addition the nuclear waste produced are very difficult to dispose which is the root reason for the radioactive pollution. Besides this due to the production of massive amount of energy there might have a chance for explosion. For instance, the Chernobyl disaster, is a nuclear accident that occurred in the north of the Ukrainian SSR in the Soviet union. Furthermore, annihilating an enormous area for the working of nuclear power plant is very hazardous for the natural ecosystems. Since there is a possibility for an explosion the anti-nationalist tense to target the nuclear power plants. Nevertheless all the nuclear power plants does not emit carbon, but it is dangerous for the nature is a fact which should not be overlooked. In short, a nuclear power plant is good for the production of energy but it would destroy a lot of natural ecosystems. Ergo, I strongly believe that the nuclear power plants are pernicious for the existence of the living beings.

A faction of the Possible spelling mistake found.populace
populance
, all around the world, undeniably
, holds the notion that the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 are life-threatening for the existence of the living organisms. This essay is in accordance with the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 statement as there are manifold reasons to substantiate it. The atomic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 emits a huge amount of radiation which causes multifarious diseases such as skin disorders, cancer, genetic mutations and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 on. In Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?addition,
addition
 the nuclear waste produced are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 difficult to dispose which is the root reason for the radioactive pollution. Besides
 this due to the production of massive amount of energy there might have a chance for explosion. For instance
, the Chernobyl disaster, is a nuclear accident that occurred in the north of the Ukrainian SSR in the If the term is a proper noun, use initial capitals.Soviet Union
Soviet union
.

Furthermore
, annihilating an enormous area for the working of nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plant
 is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 hazardous for the natural ecosystems. Since there is a possibility for an explosion the anti-nationalist tense to target the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Nevertheless,
Nevertheless
 all the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 does not emit carbon, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hazardousrisky
dangerous
 for the nature is a fact which should not be overlooked
.

In short, a nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plant
 is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 for the production of energy This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it would This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 natural ecosystems. Ergo, I strongly
 believe that the nuclear You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfunctiontalentinfluencecapabilitypotentialcapacity
power
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withflowershrubtreevinegrassseedling
plants
 are pernicious for the existence of the living beings. 