Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that it is good for spending money on finding life on other planets, while others believe it is a waste and governments should focus on problems on the earth. Discuss both views and give your opinions.

Some people think that it is good for spending money on finding life on other planets, while others believe it is a waste and governments should focus on problems on the earth. 56wDm
Spending money to explore life in outer space arouses a great deal of controversy as many people believe that the authorities should allocate the resources to fix the current problems on the Earth. It is necessary to discuss both viewpoints before forming any opinions. There is a widespread belief that searching for life in the universe is the insurance for humanity, and governments, as well as scientists, need to invest time and money in outer-space exploration and colonization. The explanation for this is that the Earth may not be able to sustain human lives for long-term since it can be destroyed by human’ heavy weapon or even naturally self-destroyed like other stars in the universe. As a result, If the governments do not invest in space science, all of humanity’s eggs are put in one small basket called ‘Earth’ and lead to extinction. On the other hand, the opponents of space exploring argue that the Earth can be regenerated, and I strongly agree with this. Since the degradation of the Earth is a long-term process, with the same amount of investments and time for outer-space, we can still save the Earth instead of leaving it. More precisely, I believe that scientists need to spend their talents on exploring how to reform the polluted areas, and the authorities should allocate more funds for these reformation projects. In addition, the governments also have to spend more resources to strictly stop and punish all over-exploited natural resources activities as well as potential environmental damages ones. In conclusion, space exploration has its own value in saving humankind; however, it is the governments’ responsibility to reform the Earth and solve all of the contemporary problems we had. Since having a life in other planets is in the far future, it is better to pay attention to our near future on Earth and save the Earth.
Spending money to explore life in outer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
space
arouses a great deal of controversy as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that the authorities should allocate the resources to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fix
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
problems on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
. It is necessary to discuss both viewpoints
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
forming any opinions.

There is a widespread belief that searching for life in the universe is the insurance for humanity, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
,
as well
as scientists, need to invest time and money in outer-space exploration and colonization. The explanation for this is that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
may not be able to sustain human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
for long-term since it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
by human’ heavy weapon or even
naturally
self-
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
like other stars in the universe.
As a result
, If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
do not invest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
space
science, all of humanity’s eggs
are put
in one
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
basket called
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
‘Earth’
and lead to extinction.

On the other hand
, the opponents of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
space
exploring argue that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
can
be regenerated
, and I
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this. Since the degradation of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
is a long-term process, with the same amount of investments and time for outer-space, we can
still
save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
instead
of leaving it. More
precisely
, I believe that scientists need to spend their talents on exploring how to reform the polluted areas, and the authorities should allocate more funds for these reformation projects.
In addition
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
also
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
spend more resources to
strictly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
and punish all over-exploited natural resources activities
as well
as potential environmental damages ones.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
space
exploration has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
value in saving humankind;
however
, it is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments’
responsibility to reform the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
and solve
Consider using "all the".
all of the
contemporary problems we had. Since having a life in other planets is in the far future, it is better to pay attention to our near future on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
and save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Earth
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that it is good for spending money on finding life on other planets, while others believe it is a waste and governments should focus on problems on the earth.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
310 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people think that it is good for spending money on finding life on other planets, while others believe it is a waste and governments should focus on problems on the earth. Discuss both views and give your opinions.