In this day and age, preserving endangered animals is a considerable problem all over the world. Some individuals believe that spending money on protecting threatened species such as the tiger or the blue whale is wasteful. To my mind, I strongly disagree with the given statement that saving endangered species is extremely crucial.
To begin with, investing money in preventing specific species from being extinct could assist the research field. To be more specific, many scientists have been doing research on extracting chemicals from animals because the use of these chemicals could help people in a great deal of aspects. For instance, rhino horns are seen as a useful medical cure because the chemical extracted from them could help to reduce the body’s temperature. Moreover, with the collaboration with genetic engineering, these species would probably be prevented from extinction.
In addition, spending a fortune in protecting threatened species could have a great deal of advantages on tourism. Constructing zoos and national parks could not only create habitats for specific animals, but also attract a great number of visitors. For example, with the investment from the government, Cuc Phuong national park in Vietnam has been a habitat for thousands of endangered animals for nearly a century and it also attracts approximately a million travelers every year. Additionally, protecting threatened animals also shows the humanity of people to help specific animals to have a better life.
To conclude, despite controversial opinions whether spending money on preserving threatened animals has a positive or negative impact. I strongly endorse the view that saving these animals could benefit both animals and people and there will be further advantages that scientists also need money to run their research.
In this day and age, preserving endangered
animals
is a considerable problem all over the world.
Some
individuals believe that spending
money
on protecting
threatened
species such as the tiger or the blue whale is wasteful. To my mind, I
strongly
disagree with the
given
statement that saving endangered species is
extremely
crucial.
To
begin
with, investing
money
in preventing
specific
species from being extinct could assist the research field.
To
be more
specific
,
many
scientists have been doing research on extracting chemicals from
animals
because
the
use
of these chemicals could
help
people
in a great deal of aspects.
For instance
, rhino horns are
seen
as a useful medical cure
because
the chemical extracted from them could
help
to
reduce
the body’s temperature.
Moreover
, with the collaboration with genetic engineering, these species would
probably
be
prevented
from extinction.
In addition
, spending a fortune in protecting
threatened
species could have a great deal of advantages on tourism. Constructing zoos and national parks could not
only
create habitats for
specific
animals
,
but
also
attract a great number of visitors.
For example
, with the investment from the
government
,
Cuc
Phuong
national park in Vietnam has been a habitat for thousands of endangered
animals
for
nearly
a century and it
also
attracts approximately a million travelers every year.
Additionally
, protecting
threatened
animals
also
shows
the humanity of
people
to
help
specific
animals
to have a better life.
To conclude
, despite controversial opinions whether spending
money
on preserving
threatened
animals
has a
positive
or
negative
impact. I
strongly
endorse the view that saving these
animals
could benefit both
animals
and
people
and there will be
further
advantages that scientists
also
need
money
to run their research.