Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. VaM6
Nowadays, pollution is one of the greatest global complications that is growing at a rapid pace and affecting several countries worldwide. Unfortunately, according to scientists research, there is a common belief that climate change and its effects are inevitable. However, we can certainly reduce its effect on the environment, so that people can have a more sustainable life. It is a popular belief that international car-free days can successfully decrease air pollution, while others believe that there are other more effective solutions. In my opinion, I cannot deny that car-free days will contribute to a reduction of air pollution, however, I think that a combination of other solutions as well as this can result in a drastic fall in air pollution. To begin with, cars are one of the largest contributors to air contamination as it emits greenhouse gases. Moreover, cars are an everyday essential that almost everyone owns. For instance, people need cars as a form of transportation to fulfil their daily errands and to go to their respective jobs, so they can earn an income to sustain themselves. Restricting their vehicle on some occasions may become a hassle for many people which can lead to the growth of tension between the citizens and the public sector. For example, enormous crowds can start a riot among the streets that can lead to utter chaos, to send a message to the government expressing their hatred because of the lack of convenience they receive. However, people can instead depend on forms of public transport such as buses, metros and so on. The outcome of this would be that there would be less reliance on petrol, which is a fossil fuel, so the environment is thus protected. On the contrary, many active environmentalists agree that there are countless ways to reduce air contamination that countries must initiate as soon as possible. It is a known fact that manufacturing companies and their numerous factories across regions dramatically damages the environment and leads to a surge of air pollution almost every week. The government can play a significant role when it comes to this. A good illustration for this is that if governments implement strict legislation and regulations on such companies in form of heavy taxation, the factories would be more mindful of the mass amount of emissions they release into the air and look for cleaner alternatives to avoid paying excessive amounts of money. Furthermore, governments can promote ways to reduce energy consumption by encouraging as well as improving the public transport services. In conclusion, although cars significantly negatively impact the air quality in many countries all over the world, they are seen as a necessity to everyone. Therefore, I personally believe that along with car-free days, we must adopt as many other effective solutions in order to achieve an outstanding fall in the level of air pollution. Eventually, this would lead to advances in the standards of living and sustainability.
Nowadays,
pollution
is one of the greatest global complications
that is
growing at a rapid pace and affecting several countries worldwide. Unfortunately, according to scientists research, there is a common belief that climate
change
and its effects are inevitable.
However
, we can
certainly
reduce
its effect on the environment,
so
that
people
can have a more sustainable life. It is a popular belief that international car-free days can
successfully
decrease
air
pollution
, while others believe that there are
other
more effective solutions. In my opinion, I cannot deny that car-free days will contribute to a reduction of
air
pollution
,
however
, I
think
that a combination of
other
solutions
as well
as this can result in a drastic fall in
air
pollution.

To
begin
with,
cars
are one of the largest contributors to
air
contamination as it emits greenhouse gases.
Moreover
,
cars
are an everyday essential that almost everyone
owns
.
For instance
,
people
need
cars
as a form of transportation to fulfil their daily errands and to go to their respective jobs,
so
they can earn an income to sustain themselves. Restricting their vehicle on
some
occasions may become a hassle for
many
people
which can
lead
to the growth of tension between the citizens and the public sector.
For example
, enormous crowds can
start
a riot among the streets that can
lead
to utter chaos, to
send
a message to the
government
expressing their hatred
because
of the lack of convenience they receive.
However
,
people
can
instead
depend on forms of public transport such as buses, metros and
so
on. The outcome of this would be that there would be less reliance on petrol, which is a fossil fuel,
so
the environment is
thus
protected.

On the contrary
,
many
active environmentalists
agree
that there are countless ways to
reduce
air
contamination that countries
must
initiate as
soon
as possible. It is a known fact that manufacturing
companies
and their numerous factories across regions
dramatically
damages the environment and leads to a surge of
air
pollution
almost every week. The
government
can play a significant role when it
comes
to this. A
good
illustration for this is that if
governments
implement strict legislation and regulations on such
companies
in form of heavy taxation, the factories would be more mindful of the mass amount of emissions they release into the
air
and look for cleaner alternatives to avoid paying excessive amounts of money.
Furthermore
,
governments
can promote ways to
reduce
energy consumption by encouraging
as well
as improving the public transport services.

In conclusion
, although
cars
significantly
negatively
impact the
air
quality in
many
countries all over the world, they are
seen
as a necessity to everyone.
Therefore
, I
personally
believe that along with car-free days, we
must
adopt as
many
other
effective solutions in order to achieve an outstanding fall in the level of
air
pollution
.
Eventually
, this would
lead
to advances in the standards of living and sustainability.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
488 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts