Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree v.1

Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills v. 1
Many people argue that knowledge in the science field, business information as well as academic one should be publicized, meanwhile, others suppose that it would be better to limit the access to the information. I believe that some vital concepts should not be easily accessible to the whole community. On the one hand, it is explanatory why some people prefer particular information should be open to the public. Provided that everyone is allowed to hold scientific techniques, the whole community would be benefitted at large, since essential and inexpensive goods would be manufactured on a substantial scale. Centuries ago, for instance, it was that only a number of people who has high socioeconomic status was able to own a clock. Once the method used to produce them was widely unveiled, the probability of possessing a clock was accessible to the poor. On the other hand, I support the idea that the access of specialized information should be restricted. On reason is that some kinds of knowledge are extremely important to such an extent that the inappropriate use of these techniques would probably be a root of some global disasters. For example, the US had bombed two residential sites in Japan, Nagasaki and Hiroshima, caused the death of thousands of Japanese at the end of the World War II. If the methodology of making the atomic bomb is obtained effortlessly to the Islamic State, the death tolls around the globe would not be able to count. Secondly, many researchers, as well as experts, devoted their entire life to searching in their chosen field, their achievements should be provided sufficient rewards such as the patent or copyright to their goals. In conclusion, the admission to access essential information should be open to the whole community, however, vital and dangerous one should be narrowly provided.
Many
people
argue that knowledge in the science field, business
information
as well
as academic one should
be publicized
, meanwhile, others suppose that it would be better to limit the access to the
information
. I believe that
some
vital concepts should not be
easily
accessible to the whole community.

On the one hand, it is explanatory why
some
people
prefer particular
information
should be open to the public. Provided that everyone is
allowed
to hold scientific techniques, the whole community would be
benefitted
at large, since essential and inexpensive
goods
would
be manufactured
on a substantial scale. Centuries ago,
for instance
, it was that
only
a number of
people
who has high socioeconomic status was able to
own
a clock. Once the method
used
to produce them was
widely
unveiled, the probability of possessing a clock was accessible to the poor.

On the other hand
, I support the
idea
that the access of specialized
information
should
be restricted
. On reason is that
some
kinds of knowledge are
extremely
important
to such an extent that the inappropriate
use
of these techniques would
probably
be a root of
some
global disasters.
For example
, the US had bombed two residential sites in Japan, Nagasaki and Hiroshima, caused the death of thousands of Japanese at the
end
of the World War II. If the methodology of making the atomic bomb
is obtained
effortlessly
to the Islamic State, the death tolls around the globe would not be able to count.
Secondly
,
many
researchers,
as well
as experts, devoted their entire life to searching in their chosen field, their achievements should
be provided
sufficient rewards such as the patent or copyright to their goals.

In conclusion
, the admission to access essential
information
should be open to the whole community,
however
, vital and
dangerous
one should be
narrowly
provided.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
302 words
7
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts