It is often believed that the best way to punish offenders is a prison sentence. Although I understand that imprisonment can have certain positive effects on criminals, I would argue that this is definitely not the optimal approach to deal with them.
On the one hand, I think it is reasonable that a prison sentence is an effective way of treating criminals. Firstly, it is true that imprisoning the offenders can mean removing a threat from the society. Incarcerating these law breakers may prevent them from committing further crimes, and it also can make them lose the competence to be involved in any crimes by the time they are released; which means prisons effectively stop their unlawful activities. According to data collected by the Vietnam Ministry of Public Security, over half 70% of ex-convicts never committed crime again within 5 years after being released. Secondly, another argument in favor of this is that the criminals’ custodial sentences may satisfy the society’s and the victim’s desire for retribution. The fact that the criminals have to forfeit their freedom is certainly a way to ease the victim’s anger and wish for revenge; otherwise, they might seek revenge by illegal means.
On the other hand, I would say that there are similarly practical alternatives to imprisonment. First, the government can invest in an educational program to correct the convicts’ anti-social thinking and behaviours. This program can persuade the wrongdoers crime committers to give up their wrong intentions at will, thus more effective than any deprivation of freedom. A group of social scientists from the US has been developing and testing such a program and reported a positive result of over 80% chance of success. In addition, a financial punishment might prove more effective than prison sentences for white-collar crimes. Many of these crimes are motivated by the pursuit of status and wealthmoney, thus the loss of such privilege and possessionsthings may be an implicit discouragement for potential criminals in this field. area.
In conclusion, while I accept that custodial sentences produce fruitful results in preventing crimes, I believe that this is not the best option. Though it can save the society from a threat and compensate for victims, I think special educational programs and financial penalties can also be just as helpful.
It is
often
believed that the best way to punish offenders is a
prison
sentence
. Although I understand that imprisonment can have certain
positive
effects on
criminals
, I would argue that this is definitely not the optimal approach to deal with them.
On the one hand, I
think
it is reasonable that a
prison
sentence
is an effective way of treating
criminals
.
Firstly
, it is true that imprisoning the offenders can mean removing a threat from the society. Incarcerating these law breakers may
prevent
them from committing
further
crimes
, and it
also
can
make
them lose the competence to
be involved
in any
crimes
by the time they
are released
; which means
prisons
effectively
stop
their unlawful activities. According to data collected by the Vietnam Ministry of Public Security, over half 70% of ex-convicts never committed
crime
again within 5 years after
being released
.
Secondly
, another argument in favor of this is that the
criminals’
custodial
sentences
may satisfy the society’s and the victim’s desire for retribution. The fact that the
criminals
have to
forfeit their freedom is
certainly
a way to
ease
the victim’s anger and wish for revenge;
otherwise
, they might seek revenge by illegal means.
On the other hand
, I would say that there are
similarly
practical alternatives to imprisonment.
First
, the
government
can invest in an educational
program
to correct the convicts’ anti-social thinking and
behaviours
. This
program
can persuade the wrongdoers
crime
committers to give up their
wrong
intentions at will,
thus
more effective than any deprivation of freedom. A group of social scientists from the US has been developing and testing such a
program
and reported a
positive
result of over 80% chance of success.
In addition
, a financial punishment might prove more effective than
prison
sentences
for white-collar
crimes
.
Many
of these
crimes
are motivated
by the pursuit of status and
wealthmoney
,
thus
the loss of such privilege and
possessionsthings
may be an implicit discouragement for potential
criminals
in this field.
area
.
In conclusion
, while I accept that custodial
sentences
produce fruitful results in preventing
crimes
, I believe that this is not the best option. Though it can save the society from a threat and compensate for victims, I
think
special educational
programs
and financial penalties can
also
be
just
as helpful.