Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. v.10
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. v. 10
A group of people believe that governments should provide subsidies for unpopular or amateur artists, while other people think that artistic people should be subsidised from another resource. The following essay will discuss both opinions, but in my personal opinion, I believe that governments should fund them before they are sponsored by alternative sources.
Several people believe that creative artist such as street painters and musicians should not be subsidised by the governments. They think that art activities are not the basic need of human beings, and governments should focus on more important matters. For example, rather than spending some budget for these street artists, the fund could be allocated for improving the public education sectors, public transportations or public facilities. They think that creative artist should seek sponsorship from private institutions or private companies.
For several reasons, some people believe that creative artist should be funded by governments. Firstly, many amateur painters have painted some of the public areas, and they have changed the look and the atmosphere of these places from a negative aura into a positive one. Secondly, some talented artists have made artistic sculptures and placed them in public areas such as in the parks, and they have made the parks become more beautiful and attractive. Thirdly, many amateur musicians who are performing in public areas, such as in subways or in bus terminals have entertained the public with their music. Therefore, it is undeniable that the existence of these artists brings benefits for the society and governments should subsidise them.
In conclusion, people have different opinions about funding creative artists. Some people think that they should be funded by governments, while others believe that they should be subsidised by other resources. In my point of view, I think governments should allocate some budget for amateur artists as they bring benefits for individuals and communities, but once they have become professional, they should seek sponsorship from other resources, and the government should stop providing the subsidy.
A group of
people
believe
that
governments
should provide subsidies for unpopular or amateur
artists
, while
other
people
think
that artistic
people
should be
subsidised
from another resource. The following essay will discuss both opinions,
but
in my personal opinion, I
believe
that
governments
should fund them
before
they
are sponsored
by alternative sources.
Several
people
believe
that
creative
artist
such as street painters and musicians should not be
subsidised
by the
governments
. They
think
that art activities are not the basic need of human beings, and
governments
should focus on more
important
matters.
For example
,
rather
than spending
some
budget for these street
artists
, the fund could
be allocated
for improving the
public
education sectors,
public
transportations or
public
facilities. They
think
that
creative
artist
should seek sponsorship from private institutions or private
companies
.
For several reasons,
some
people
believe
that
creative
artist
should
be funded
by
governments
.
Firstly
,
many
amateur painters have painted
some of the
public
areas, and they have
changed
the look and the atmosphere of these places from a
negative
aura into a
positive
one.
Secondly
,
some
talented
artists
have made artistic sculptures and placed them in
public
areas such as in the parks, and they have made the parks become more
beautiful
and attractive.
Thirdly
,
many
amateur musicians who are performing in
public
areas, such as in subways or in bus terminals have entertained the
public
with their music.
Therefore
, it is undeniable that the existence of these
artists
brings benefits for the society and
governments
should
subsidise
them.
In conclusion
,
people
have
different
opinions about funding
creative
artists
.
Some
people
think
that they should
be funded
by
governments
, while others
believe
that they should be
subsidised
by
other
resources. In my point of view, I
think
governments
should allocate
some
budget for amateur
artists
as they bring benefits for individuals and communities,
but
once they have become professional, they should seek sponsorship from
other
resources, and the
government
should
stop
providing the subsidy.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
49Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes