It is commonly argued by a few people that financial help offered by the state must be curtailed as it does not benefit the upliftment of people, who does not possess a home or are not having a job. I will try to present the arguments explicitly in the following paragraphs to achieve the satisfactory conclusion.
Firstly, There are numerous reasons, due to which on nation shall not grant donations to other territorial entity and one of the causes is drained of taxpayer money. It is obvious that all national treasures are funded by the citizens of that country by paying the nation in lieu of taxes. All that raised finance is conceptually deposited by nationals to be utilised in not only routine chores, but also for provisions of underprivileged as they are the dire responsibility of the federal. Apart from that, some special reserved funds may be required to counter with contingencies natural disasters like famine, flood, epidemic etcetera, and thus to support those who does not have the resources to deal with such situations. Hence nation must have focus to spend such public resources to strengthen the poor either by creating the jobs or arranging the shelter for them.
Even though, Public money is expected to be spent on within the nation for better economic conditions instead of charity, However we can not deny the fact that helping the global neighbourhood gives a country and its population an identity and thus leading to better and stronger relations worldwide. In addition to this it is not suggested for a nation to isolate itself from another state in time of emergency as it is against the basic human values. Further, it is our moral duty to stand with our allies in case of exigency.
In a nutshell, it could be summed up that primarily one nation must not push itself in crisis and must do all it could do to turn the lives of citizens unless it is in excellent condition to donate.
It is
commonly
argued by a few
people
that financial
help
offered by the state
must
be curtailed
as it does not benefit the
upliftment
of
people
, who does not possess a home or are not having a job. I will try to present the arguments
explicitly
in the following paragraphs to achieve the satisfactory conclusion.
Firstly
, There are numerous reasons, due to which on
nation
shall not grant donations to other territorial entity and one of the causes
is drained
of taxpayer money. It is obvious that all national treasures
are funded
by the citizens of that country by paying the
nation
in lieu of taxes. All that raised finance is
conceptually
deposited by nationals to be
utilised
in not
only
routine chores,
but
also
for provisions of underprivileged as they are the dire responsibility of the federal. Apart from that,
some
special reserved funds may
be required
to counter with contingencies natural disasters like famine, flood, epidemic etcetera, and
thus
to support those who does not have the resources to deal with such situations.
Hence
nation
must
have focus to spend such public resources to strengthen the poor either by creating the jobs or arranging the shelter for them.
Even though
, Public money is
expected
to
be spent
on within the
nation
for better economic conditions
instead
of charity,
However
we can not deny the fact that helping the global
neighbourhood
gives a country and its population an identity and
thus
leading to better and stronger relations worldwide.
In addition
to this it is not suggested for a
nation
to isolate itself from another state in time of emergency as it is against the basic human values.
Further
, it is our moral duty to stand with our allies in case of exigency.
In a nutshell, it could
be summed
up that
primarily
one
nation
must
not push itself in crisis and
must
do all it could do to turn the
lives
of citizens unless it is in excellent condition to donate.