Everyday, we hear about one crime or the other and we also hear about punishments being handed out to criminals. Some people believe that there should be the same punishment for a given type of crime while others believe that punishment should be give out based on the circumstances of the crime and the motivations of the perpetrator. This essay will discuss both sides of the coin and put forward the argument that each crime must be analysed separately.
Some people say that a crime is a crime and hence deserves the same kind of punishment. In their eyes, if someone robes a bank off a million dollars or if a beggar
steals a packet of cookies from a grocery store, both these crimes are of the same nature and hence both criminals deserve the same treatment. If a person with
a past criminal record commits murder, or if a person kills someone in self defense, they both should be equally guilty in eyes of the law. While this line of
thinking seems absurd, it does offer one advantage, that of fast tracking the legal procedure. Legal cases are notorious for running for decades and by
standardizing the punishments, victims and their families might get closure quickly.
However, there is another side to the story. Most crimes are not black and white and there are shades of grey which must be considered before announcing judgements.
Consider two scenarios: firstly, a woman who kills her attacker in self preservation and secondly, a man kills and robs another person. Can you
imagine both the woman and the man being sentenced to 10 years in prison? Wouldn't that be incredulous! The former is not even a criminal, instead, she is a
victim of a crime.
To conclude, the merits of assessing each crime on a case to case basis outweigh the merits of treating crimes in a homogeneous manner. Each situation presents a unique set of circumstances and these must be taken into consideration before announcing punishments.
Everyday
, we hear about one
crime
or the
other and
we
also
hear about
punishments
being handed
out to
criminals
.
Some
people
believe that there should be the same
punishment
for a
given
type of
crime
while others believe that
punishment
should be give out based on the circumstances of the
crime
and the motivations of the perpetrator. This essay will discuss both sides of the coin and put forward the argument that each
crime
must
be
analysed
separately
.
Some
people
say that a
crime
is a
crime
and
hence
deserves the same kind of
punishment
. In their eyes, if someone robes a bank off a million dollars or if a beggar
steals a packet of cookies from a grocery store, both these
crimes
are of the same nature and
hence
both
criminals
deserve the same treatment. If a person with
a past
criminal
record commits murder, or if a person kills someone in
self defense
, they both should be
equally
guilty in eyes of the law. While this line of
thinking seems absurd, it does offer one advantage, that of
fast
tracking the legal procedure. Legal cases are notorious for running for decades and
by
standardizing
the
punishments
, victims and their families might
get
closure
quickly
.
However
, there is another side to the story. Most
crimes
are not black and white and there are shades of
grey
which
must
be considered
before
announcing judgements.
Consider two scenarios:
firstly
, a woman who kills her attacker in
self preservation
and
secondly
, a
man
kills and robs another person. Can you
imagine both the woman and the
man
being sentenced
to 10 years in prison? Wouldn't that be incredulous! The former is not even a
criminal
,
instead
, she is a
victim of a crime.
To conclude
, the merits of assessing each
crime
on a case to case basis outweigh the merits of treating
crimes
in a homogeneous manner
. Each situation presents a unique set of circumstances and these
must
be taken
into consideration
before
announcing
punishments
.