Government investing in projects is a controversial issue. however, there are predominately two contrasting views where a section of society vehemently deems that government should invest resources in those projects which is for the protection of fauna, while others emphasis that government should allocate funds for projects other than wildlife project. In my opinion, I believe that a balanced approach should be adopted.
Apparently, various factors make a section of individuals advocate that investing funds for the protection of wildlife is essential. First and foremost is, wildlife is a significant part of ecosystem as they help in maintaining the ecological balance of nature. So, their protection is necessary. Secondly, wildlife of the nation helps in attracting the tourism which assist in the proliferation of gross domestic income of the host country. South Africa, to exemplify, earn voluminous amount of financial resources because annually thousands of people visit the country to experience its animal safari.
On the other hand, some believe that Regime should allocate funds for the development of other sectors for myriad reasons. Chiefly, injecting funds for the establishment of industries assist in reducing the rate of unemployment which further Not only improves standard of living but also decline rate of poverty in the country. For instance, Canadian government invest 10% of its national income in the development of industrial sector which generate lucrative job opportunities for the civilians. Furthermore, government should allocate resources for the upliftment of education sector as well as infrastructure because skilled human resources along with adequate facilities play an indispensable role in the development of the country.
In my profound opinion, I believe investment for the protection of wildlife and in other sectors such as education infrastructure and health are required for the overall development of every nation because both have the own importance.
Government
investing in
projects
is a controversial issue.
however
, there are
predominately
two contrasting views where a section of society
vehemently
deems that
government
should invest resources in those
projects
which is for the
protection
of fauna, while others emphasis that
government
should allocate funds for
projects
other
than
wildlife
project
. In my opinion, I believe that a balanced approach should
be adopted
.
Apparently
, various factors
make
a section of individuals
advocate
that investing funds for the
protection
of
wildlife
is essential.
First
and foremost is,
wildlife
is a significant part of ecosystem as they
help
in maintaining the ecological balance of nature.
So
, their
protection
is necessary.
Secondly
,
wildlife
of the nation
helps
in attracting the tourism which assist in the proliferation of gross domestic income of the host country. South Africa, to exemplify, earn voluminous amount of financial resources
because
annually
thousands of
people
visit the country to experience its animal safari.
On the
other
hand,
some
believe that Regime should allocate funds for the
development
of
other
sectors
for myriad reasons.
Chiefly
, injecting funds for the establishment of industries assist in reducing the rate of unemployment which
further
Not
only
improves
standard of living
but
also
decline rate of poverty in the country.
For instance
, Canadian
government
invest 10% of its national income in the
development
of industrial
sector
which generate lucrative job opportunities for the civilians.
Furthermore
,
government
should allocate resources for the
upliftment
of education
sector
as well
as infrastructure
because
skilled human resources along with adequate facilities play an indispensable role in the
development
of the country.
In my profound opinion, I believe investment for the
protection
of
wildlife
and in
other
sectors
such as education infrastructure and health
are required
for the
overall
development
of every nation
because
both have the
own
importance.