Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that euthanasia as a way to terminate someone' suffering should be legalized whereas others are horrified and point out the immoral side of the issue. To what extent do you agree with euthanasia?

Some people think that euthanasia as a way to terminate someone' suffering should be legalized whereas others are horrified and point out the immoral side of the issue. g9Xl
Currently, the topic of euthanasia is one of the most relevant controversy with opponents pointing out the immorality of killing and lack of control over the process (the possibility of bribery and pressure from the family), and supporters, ascertaiting the economic injustice of providing the disabled and sufffering of the people around. I am a supporter of the school of thought that considers that mercy killing should be allowed, but not in developing countries. . With respect to ethics, according to my personal opinion, even if agony prevails over joy, life is still a blessing because a person is able to experience and feel. However, every individual is a master of his own life and only he can decide whether to accept this gift or not. We have no right to forbid him to do it. If a person does not comprehend the meaning of his life and has no desire to continue, I reckon, he should be let to have himself conducted a euthanasia because if it is not legalised and a person still has a consciousness, as a result, he will suicide. By mercy killing, at least, people can facilitate his burden at the end of his path. Furthermore, considering people who were brought to a vegetative state because of the illness and have no self-awareness, this type of life resembles the life of a dying tree rather than a life of a person. Euthanasia would be a relief for his close ones and himself too. Concerning practical factors, money is annually allocated from the public budget in order to ensure people who actually want to die with basic needs and sustenance. Moreover, it is a huge encumbrance for a family of a sick person. Relatives of a dying person spend large sums of money to maintain life in him, despite the lack of the possibility of recovery. They often get into debt and loans, and the need to look after a dying loved one creates psychological problems for relatives, up to clinical disorders. Nevertheless, I wholeheartedly believe that euthanasia should never be used in not developed countries where is a high level of corruption. First of all, the introduction of the practice of euthanasia is threatened with great abuse. Lack of control over euthanasia, especially involuntary euthanasia, can lead to the fact that it can be used in a situation where it can be avoided. Besides, euthanasia, carried out not by the will of the dying person himself, may be out of selfish motives on the part of his heirs or third parties. So in order to check it, there should be well-organised commission and inspectors which is quite complicated to implement in developing communities. Also, if we want to allow euthanasia, we will have to work on legislative framework and the scroll of criterias. Henceforth, it can be confidently concluded that mercy killing needs to be permitted only in prospered nations with fair government and corresponding laws.
Currently
, the topic of euthanasia is one of the most relevant controversy with opponents pointing out the immorality of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
killing
and lack of control over the process (the possibility of bribery and pressure from the family), and supporters,
Possible spelling mistake found.
ascertaiting
the economic injustice of providing the disabled and
Possible spelling mistake found.
sufffering
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
around. I am a supporter of the school of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
that considers that mercy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
killing
should be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developing countries
.
Don't put a space before the full stop
.


With respect to ethics, according to my personal opinion, even if agony prevails over joy,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
is
still
a blessing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
is able to experience and feel.
However
, every individual is a master of his
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
he can decide whether to accept this gift or not. We have no right to forbid him to do it. If a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
does not comprehend the meaning of his
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
and has no desire to continue, I reckon, he should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
let
to have himself conducted a euthanasia
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
if it is not
Possible spelling mistake. 'legalised' is British English.
legalised
and a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
still
has a consciousness,
as a result
, he will suicide. By mercy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
killing
, at least,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can facilitate his burden at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of his path.
Furthermore
, considering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
were brought
to a vegetative state
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the illness and have no self-awareness, this type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
resembles the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dying
tree
rather
than a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
. Euthanasia would be a relief for his close ones and himself too.

Concerning practical factors, money is
annually
allocated from the public budget in order to ensure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who actually want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
with basic needs and sustenance.
Moreover
, it is a huge encumbrance for a family of a sick
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
. Relatives of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
spend large sums of money to maintain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
in him, despite the lack of the possibility of recovery. They
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
into debt and loans, and the need to look after a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dying
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
loved
one creates psychological problems for relatives, up to clinical disorders.

Nevertheless
, I
wholeheartedly
believe that euthanasia should never be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
developed countries
where is a high level of corruption.
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, the introduction of the practice of euthanasia
is threatened
with great abuse. Lack of control over euthanasia,
especially
involuntary euthanasia, can lead to the fact that it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in a situation where it can
be avoided
.
Besides
, euthanasia, carried out not by the will of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
dying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
himself, may be out of selfish motives on the part of his heirs or third parties.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
it, there should be
Possible spelling mistake. 'well-organised' is British English.
well-organised
commission and inspectors which is quite complicated to implement in developing communities.
Also
, if we want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
euthanasia, we will
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
work on legislative framework and the scroll of
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "criteria", the plural form of the noun 'criteria'?
criterias
.

Henceforth, it can be
confidently
concluded that mercy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
killing
needs to
be permitted
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
in prospered nations with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
and corresponding laws.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that euthanasia as a way to terminate someone' suffering should be legalized whereas others are horrified and point out the immoral side of the issue.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
491 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts