Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that couples should live togrther before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance. What is your opinion? v.1

Some people think that couples should live togrther before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance. What is your opinion? v. 1
It is widely believed that couples should move in together before walking down the island, since it helps them to find out if they are a perfect match for each other. I completely disagree with this notion because this attitude damages a value of being married and may cause legal problems in case of early separation. The main reason why I do not believe that couples should live together before the wedding is the fact that this may destroy their perception of marriage. Today, more and more people ruin a its real value by preferring to live together rather than legally tying knots with their significant other. Since living together is not frowned upon anymore, people do not strive to get married in order to share their live with their loved ones. As a consequence, nowadays people perceive wedlock as a burden not the way to start life with their second half. Another solid reason why I believe that couples should not live together without getting married is the fact that this attitude may complicate litigations if the couple split up before the wedding. Since many couples live together for many years, deciding whether they are compatible, sometimes they acquire a significant amount of property together. Unfortunately, in many countries living together do not guarantee a fair split of such property and, as a result, one of the couple may end up empty handed. However, legal marriage gives more security in terms of joint assets. In conclusion, I firmly believe that living together out of wedlock is not a good idea because it damages the value of marriage and leads to difficulties during splitting joint property if the couple breaks up before the wedding.
It is
widely
believed that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
in together
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
before
walking down the island, since it
In informal texts, 'to' is not necessary. Do you mean "helps them find"?
helps them to find
out if they are a perfect match for each other. I completely disagree with this notion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
this attitude damages a value of
being married
and may cause legal problems in case of early separation.

The main reason why I do not believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
live
together
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
before
the wedding is the fact that this may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
their perception of marriage.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Today
, more and more
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
ruin
A determiner cannot combine with a possessive pronoun. Did you mean simply "its real" or "a real"?
a its real
value by preferring to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
live
together
rather
than
legally
tying knots with their significant other. Since living together is not frowned upon anymore,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
do not strive to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
married in order to share their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
live
with their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
loved
ones. As a consequence, nowadays
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
perceive wedlock as a burden not the way to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
life with their second half.

Another solid reason why I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
should not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
live
together without getting married is the fact that this attitude may complicate
Possible spelling mistake found.
litigations
if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
split up
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
before
the wedding. Since
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
live
together for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
years, deciding whether they are compatible,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
they acquire a significant amount of property together. Unfortunately, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries living together do not guarantee a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
split of such property and,
as a result
, one of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
up
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
empty handed
.
However
, legal marriage gives more security in terms of joint assets.

In conclusion
, I
firmly
believe that living together out of wedlock is not a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it damages the value of marriage and leads to difficulties during splitting joint property if the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
breaks up
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
before
the wedding.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
16Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people think that couples should live togrther before getting married to start knowing each other better and see if they are compatible. Others say that because of this tendency people become immoral and only deep emotional attachment makes a durable alliance. What is your opinion? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
284 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts