There is a diversity of opinions between people about what children should
study. A part of society opines that pupil should be educated with History while
rest prefer that Science subjects should be taught to them. This essay will
discuss why former view is righteous since History empowers pupils about their
foundations as well as this essay will discuss why second view is justified
because Science helps children become better at getting employed at later
stage. Eventually, I will give my personal viewpoint.
Why the first view is justified because History if it is taught to pupils, it makes
them able to understand about their roots. Means to say, they will be educated
and aware about who they are, who were their ancestors and how did their
country grow which will enrich their candidature in future. For example, if a childis not educated about his history, he is not a completely aware child about his
origin and he cannot speak firmly about his foundations. Therefore, teaching
him History is going to help him strongly.
Why the second view is righteous since teaching the child about science makes
him confident to build a career in latest technology. Such as, engineers and
scientists are highly needed to innovate and to bring a change in the standards
of life. For example, a country having a huge number of technocrats and
Science-based professionals can compete effectively and efficiently with the
world. Thence, Science subjects if taught to pupils can bring out the scientists
within the pupils.
This essay has discussed why first viewpoint is justified because History subject
educates pupils about their origins and foundations along with it, this essay has
also discussed why latter view is righteous as science stream aids children
become academically stronger at later stage. Finally, I personally believe that
both of the subjects have their own significance and it solely depends on a child
where he finds himself better absorbed.
There is a diversity of opinions between
people
about what children should
study
. A part of society opines that
pupil
should
be educated
with
History
while
rest
prefer
that
Science
subjects should
be taught
to them. This
essay
will
discuss why former
view
is righteous since
History
empowers
pupils
about their
foundations
as well
as this
essay
will discuss why second
view
is justified
because
Science
helps
children become better at getting employed at later
stage
.
Eventually
, I will give my personal viewpoint.
Why the
first
view
is justified
because
History
if it
is taught
to
pupils
, it
makes
them
able to understand about their roots. Means to say, they will be
educated
and aware about who they are, who were their ancestors and how did their
country
grow which will enrich their candidature
in future
.
For example
, if a
childis
not educated about his
history
, he is not a completely aware child about
his
origin
and he cannot speak
firmly
about his foundations.
Therefore
, teaching
him
History
is going to
help
him
strongly
.
Why the second
view
is righteous since teaching the child about
science
makes
him
confident to build a career in
latest
technology. Such as, engineers
and
scientists are
highly
needed to innovate and to bring a
change
in the standards
of
life.
For example
, a country having a huge number of technocrats
and
Science-based professionals can compete
effectively
and
efficiently
with the
world
. Thence,
Science
subjects if taught to
pupils
can bring out the scientists
within the pupils.
This
essay
has discussed why
first
viewpoint
is justified
because
History
subject
educates
pupils
about their origins and foundations along with it, this
essay
has
also
discussed why latter
view
is righteous as
science
stream aids children
become
academically
stronger at later stage.
Finally
, I
personally
believe that
both of the subjects have their
own
significance and it
solely
depends on a child
where
he finds himself better absorbed.