A number of people conclude that mathematics and philosophy should be non compulsory lessons since they are sophisticated, while others believe that scholars should learn these subjects obligately. This essay will cast light on both views and I would support the latter opinion.
On the one hand, it is reasonable why some argue that maths and philosophy should not be included in the main study schedules. One apparent explanation is that learning such subjects might affect the quality of student learning. To be particular, the numbers in maths as well as theories in philosophy are usually so boring and complicated that students could not understand it right away. This leads to the reduction in students' concentration during class time. When pupils cannot catch up with the lectures, they will find ways to entertain or do something else, thus missing the important knowledge. Therefore several will feel that they are not as good as others in class, which puts them at a higher risk of stress.
On the other hand, it is necessary to let mathematics and philosophy be the obligatory lessons. This is because these two subjects are extremely beneficial to the scholar’s brain. To be specific, they are both logical subjects that could stimulate students' thinking in an effective way. Therefore, the foundation for pupils' ability to handle difficult situations in the future could be set up. For instance, when a person encounters several conflicts between participants in the same work, they will need to solve the problem by rationally applying acquired knowledge. Therefore, after the arguments are tackled, learners’ social ties could be enhanced and they could get happier in life.
In conclusion, I would confirm that despite the complication in learning mathematics and philosophy, they should be involved in the list of compulsory subjects due to the benefits they could bring.
A number of
people
conclude that mathematics and
philosophy
should be
non compulsory
lessons since they
are sophisticated
, while others believe that scholars should learn these
subjects
obligately
. This essay will cast light on both views and I would support the latter opinion.
On the one hand, it is reasonable why
some
argue that
maths
and
philosophy
should not
be included
in the main study schedules. One apparent explanation is that learning such
subjects
might affect the quality of student learning. To be particular, the numbers in
maths
as well
as theories in
philosophy
are
usually
so
boring and complicated that students could not understand it right away. This leads to the reduction in students' concentration during
class
time. When pupils cannot catch up with the lectures, they will find ways to entertain or do something else,
thus
missing the
important
knowledge.
Therefore
several will feel that they are not as
good
as others in
class
, which puts them at a higher
risk
of
stress
.
On the other hand
, it is necessary to
let
mathematics and
philosophy
be the obligatory lessons. This is
because
these two
subjects
are
extremely
beneficial to the scholar’s brain. To be specific, they are both logical
subjects
that could stimulate students' thinking
in an effective way
.
Therefore
, the foundation for pupils' ability to handle difficult situations in the future could
be set
up.
For instance
, when a person encounters several conflicts between participants in the same work, they will need to solve the problem by
rationally
applying acquired knowledge.
Therefore
, after the arguments
are tackled
, learners’ social ties could be
enhanced and
they could
get
happier in life.
In conclusion
, I would confirm that despite the complication in learning mathematics and
philosophy
, they should
be involved
in the list of compulsory
subjects
due to the benefits they could bring.