A highly controversial issue appears to relate to whether children should be given liberty to decide on daily needs or it will create selfish individuals in our society. This essay will shed light on both sides of the discussion and provide my personal view on the matter.
On the one hand, children who are allowed to choose whatever they like would struggle with personality disorders later on. To wit, if juveniles are allowed to reach everything without any restriction they might ignore affordability of their parents of what they wish to purchase. As a result, they will become overindulgent and self-centred individuals in the future who underestimate necessities of the family and care only about his own wishes recklessly.
On the other hand, decision-making is a critical and crucial skill for a child to acquire in order to succeed in future life and career. Psychologists often express that interrupting youngsters’ choices will cause them to become fragile-minded and diffident. Needless to say, offspring who is able to decide on basic needs right from his childhood can deal with conflicts and challenges in life more efficiently. Besides, deciding on day-to-day basis makes them independent and build their confidence. These practices, make youngsters proactive and aids them get used to take decision and responsibility for any situation and action. For example, if a boy knows why he needs to watch a program without asking anyone then he ultimately develops the skill of what is suitable for him.
To conclude, both sides, once debated from distinct angles seem to hold sensible reasons. However, I assert that parents should make sure that children are free in choosing what to eat or wear and how to entertain so that they do not lack self-confidence and creativity.
A
highly
controversial issue appears to relate to whether children should be
given
liberty to decide on daily needs or it will create selfish individuals in our society. This essay will shed light on both sides of the discussion and provide my personal view on the matter.
On the one hand, children who are
allowed
to choose whatever they like would struggle with personality disorders later on. To wit, if juveniles are
allowed
to reach everything without any restriction they might
ignore
affordability of their parents of what they wish to
purchase
.
As a result
, they will become overindulgent and
self-centred
individuals in the future who underestimate necessities of the family and care
only
about his
own
wishes
recklessly
.
On the other hand
, decision-making is a critical and crucial
skill
for a child to acquire in order to succeed in future life and career. Psychologists
often
express that interrupting youngsters’ choices will cause them to become fragile-minded and diffident. Needless to say, offspring who is able to decide on basic needs right from his childhood can deal with conflicts and challenges in life more
efficiently
.
Besides
, deciding on day-to-day basis
makes
them independent and build their confidence. These practices,
make
youngsters proactive and aids them
get
used
to take decision and responsibility for any situation and action.
For example
, if a boy knows why he needs to
watch
a program without asking anyone then he
ultimately
develops the
skill
of what is suitable for him.
To conclude
, both sides, once debated from distinct angles seem to hold sensible reasons.
However
, I assert that parents should
make
sure that children are free in choosing what to eat or wear and how to entertain
so
that they do not lack self-confidence and creativity.