Some people harbour a belief that how much choice students should select to study at the university instead they are forced to study the certain courses about science or technology, while others hold the reverse viewpoint. From my perspective, it is a controversial issues which deserves an in-depth discussion.
To begin with, one of the main argument in its favour is that university students should be free to choose their prefered areas of study. Society will benefit more, if our students ignite the passion of learning which they are interesting. Furthermore, nobody can predict that which area of study will be most useful to society in the future and also it may be that employers value the creative thinking skills instead of technical skills; if this were the case, we would need to learn the knowledge of art, history and philosophy than science and technology.
On the other hand, some people occasionally realize the fact that the universities should only provide the key subjects courses which will useful in the future. They may assert university courses such as medicine, computer science, engineering and information of technology rather than some art degrees. It is true that these certain courses will offer more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries and also improve the quality of life for students. Besides aforementioned, the governments can ensure to bridge the gap between these professional knowledge and human society also lead to development of new technology, economic growth and greater future prosperity by forcing people to choose particular university subjects.
In conclusion, despite the fact that universities focus only on certain subjects may bring the large for students future; however, I personally prefer current system for students who can select what they want to learn. 
 Some
  people
  harbour
 a belief that how much choice  
students
 should select to  
study
 at the  
university
  instead
 they  
are forced
 to  
study
 the certain  
courses
 about science or technology, while others hold the reverse viewpoint. From my perspective, it is a controversial  
issues
 which deserves an in-depth discussion.
To  
begin
 with, one of the main argument in its  
favour
 is that  
university
  students
 should be free to choose their  
prefered
 areas of  
study
. Society will benefit more, if our  
students
 ignite the passion of learning which they are interesting.  
Furthermore
, nobody can predict that which area of  
study
 will be most useful to society in the  
future
 and  
also
 it may be that employers value the creative thinking  
skills
  instead
 of technical  
skills
; if this were the case, we would need to learn the knowledge of art, history and philosophy than science and technology. 
On the other hand
,  
some
  people
  occasionally
 realize the fact that the  
universities
 should  
only
 provide the key subjects  
courses
 which will useful in the  
future
. They may assert  
university
  courses
 such as medicine, computer science, engineering and information of technology  
rather
 than  
some
 art degrees. It is true that these certain  
courses
 will offer more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries and  
also
  improve
 the quality of life for  
students
.  
Besides
 aforementioned, the  
governments
 can ensure to bridge the gap between these professional knowledge and human society  
also
 lead to development of new technology, economic growth and greater  
future
 prosperity by forcing  
people
 to choose particular  
university
 subjects. 
In conclusion
, despite the fact that  
universities
 focus  
only
 on certain subjects may bring the large for  
students
  future
;  
however
, I  
personally
 prefer  
current
 system for  
students
 who can select what they want to learn.