It is argued that all undergraduates in universities ought to major in their preferred areas, whereas others think that it is more beneficial for their future to study modern subjects such as science and technology. While allowing students to study their favorable subjects would encourage them to learn better, I believe that focusing on contemporary subjects qualifies them to labor market.
On the one hand, it is perfectly reasonable to think that university students should study their favorite topics because this would fire enthusiasm to learn. If students choose whatever they like, this will encourage them to passionately delve into them, which would likely not only improve their practical skills, but also their theoretical ones. For example, same initiative in Japan has resulted in graduating knowledgeable and skillful members. However, it does not make any sense for me to turn a blind eye to the importance of modern topics in the AI-equipped era.
On the other hand, studying physics and science is an idea to be appreciated as these would play a pivotal role when it comes finding a profession in the future. As technology progresses in a starling pace, learners have to acquire up-to-date information in order to keep themselves abreast of the up-to-minute technological advancements. Recent Canadian study revealed that given that these topics were paid a special attention in universities, this would contribute to improving graduates' personal qualifications, which is certainly essential in terms of meeting the requirements of modern labor market. I, therefore, believe that educational institutes have to involve students in contemporary topics, if they are heading to offer them better recruitment opportunities.
In conclusion, even though allowing students to study their preferred topics would confer them on a better learning experience, I feel that keeping a vigilant eye on recent subjects is a good idea for graduates' careers.
It
is argued
that all undergraduates in universities ought to major in their preferred areas, whereas others
think
that it is more beneficial for their future to
study
modern
subjects
such as science and technology. While allowing
students
to
study
their favorable
subjects
would encourage them to learn better, I believe that focusing on contemporary
subjects
qualifies them to labor market.
On the one hand, it is
perfectly
reasonable to
think
that university
students
should
study
their favorite
topics
because
this would fire enthusiasm to learn. If
students
choose whatever they like, this will encourage them to
passionately
delve into them, which would likely not
only
improve
their practical
skills
,
but
also
their theoretical ones.
For example
, same initiative in Japan has resulted in graduating knowledgeable and skillful members.
However
, it does not
make
any sense for me to turn a blind eye to the importance of modern
topics
in the AI-equipped era.
On the other hand
, studying physics and science is an
idea
to
be appreciated
as these would play a pivotal role when it
comes
finding a profession in the future. As technology progresses in a starling pace, learners
have to
acquire up-to-date information in order to
keep
themselves abreast of the up-to-minute technological advancements. Recent Canadian
study
revealed that
given
that these
topics
were paid
a special attention in universities, this would contribute to improving graduates' personal qualifications, which is
certainly
essential in terms of meeting the requirements of modern labor market. I,
therefore
, believe that educational institutes
have to
involve
students
in contemporary
topics
, if they are heading to offer them better recruitment opportunities.
In conclusion
,
even though
allowing
students
to
study
their preferred
topics
would confer them on a better learning experience, I feel that keeping a vigilant eye on recent
subjects
is a
good
idea
for graduates' careers.