Whether university students should study subjects of their own choices or should they be obliged to study career oriented technology and science major subjects is a widely debated issue. Some citizens reckon that students should have their freedom to study subjects which they are interested; whilst others accord that they have to be involved in major that will be very utilitarian in the future. Both of these views have arguments for and against them and this essay delves these views and expresses my opinion before drawing a reasonable conclusion.
To embark upon, a university is the highest citadel for education in a country and it is considered the next adept generation who would lead the country. From these regards, the education and teaching policy of the university affect the whole nation. For example, some experts tend to say “the students at university level should be given certain freedom while picking majors they study in and there should not be any predefined syllabus”. They opine that forcing them to study some latest subjects for the future employment would make them become workers for offices, not leaders for the country, however, they also express that letting them study a wide range of subjects would make them far more knowledgeable and prepared to take challenges and this policy would inspire tertiary level students to follow their dream and not just blindly run for their career. Furthermore, society needs as many artists as there are as many scientists. Forcing university students to study only science and teach related subjects would create an imbalance in our society.
On the flip side, the university authority must consider the consequences of letting students choose their subjects. For example, a recent study shows that predefined syllabus-bound a student study regularly and prepares for the exam while freedom to take any subject dramatically increases the number of dropout students. This is an alarming issue and this is why the university authority needs to think twice before implementing the policy. Furthermore, development of a nation, these days, highly depends on the technologically sound workforce and universities should yield such workforce for the country. From this perspective, it seems quite logical for universities to teach science related subjects to most of its students.
To conclude, certain freedom while picking subjects in university level is extremely helpful for the overall development and knowledge enhancement of students. An absolute freedom would make the outcome worse.
Whether
university
students
should
study
subjects
of their
own
choices or should they
be obliged
to
study
career oriented technology and science major
subjects
is a
widely
debated issue.
Some
citizens reckon that
students
should have their
freedom
to
study
subjects
which they
are interested
; whilst others accord that they
have to
be involved
in major that will be
very
utilitarian in the future. Both of these views have arguments for and against them and this essay delves these views and expresses my opinion
before
drawing a reasonable conclusion.
To embark upon, a
university
is the highest citadel for education in a
country
and it
is considered
the
next
adept generation who would lead the
country
. From these regards, the education and teaching policy of the
university
affect the whole nation.
For example
,
some
experts tend to say “the
students
at
university
level should be
given
certain
freedom
while picking majors they
study
in and there should not be any predefined syllabus”. They opine that forcing them to
study
some
latest
subjects
for the future employment would
make
them become workers for offices, not leaders for the
country
,
however
, they
also
express that letting them
study
a wide range of
subjects
would
make
them far more knowledgeable and prepared to take challenges and this policy would inspire tertiary level
students
to follow their dream and not
just
blindly
run for their career.
Furthermore
, society needs as
many
artists as there are as
many
scientists. Forcing
university
students
to
study
only
science and teach related
subjects
would create an imbalance in our society.
On the flip side, the
university
authority
must
consider the consequences of letting
students
choose their
subjects
.
For example
, a recent
study
shows
that predefined syllabus-bound a
student
study
regularly
and prepares for the exam while
freedom
to take any
subject
dramatically
increases the number of dropout
students
. This is an alarming issue and this is why the
university
authority needs to
think
twice
before
implementing the policy.
Furthermore
, development of a nation, these days,
highly
depends on the
technologically
sound workforce and
universities
should yield such workforce for the
country
. From this perspective, it seems quite logical for
universities
to teach science related
subjects
to most of its students.
To conclude
, certain
freedom
while picking
subjects
in
university
level is
extremely
helpful for the
overall
development and knowledge enhancement of
students
. An absolute
freedom
would
make
the outcome worse.