In recent years, universities have started giving more choices in thier courses. Some people believe that college-goers should be allowed to choose subjects, while others say that futuristic topics of the scientific nature should be promoted. My opinion is that, areas of interest of an individual should be considered while crafting an educational course for him.
On one hand, the emphasis is on keeping young generation employable and relevant. Proponents of such line of thought argue that learning technology is inevitable for the youth, and therefore it should be made a part of college education. However, such practices can lead to starvation of talent in arts and other social education streams. These tendencies can result in ushering of students, with artistic acumen, into technical streams. This can be illustrated by many workplace surveys, in which engineers working in such organizations have confessed to be in wrong line of work. Such outcomes can be attributed to going with an educational paradigm, during college days, which was not suited to one's abilities.
On the other hand, a section of society believes that universities should enable attendies to choose subjects on basis of their own liking. In my opinion, this is a welcome change as it can bring diversity in one's education. For example, an engineer who chose to study music in his college days can end up designing next generation of musical gadgets. Moreover, people studying focused streams such as medicines will be able to choose completely different subjects, which can admittedly lead to more innovations in their respective fields.
To conclude, keeping future workforce relevant is an important aspect of education. Nevertheless, it should also be considered that such relevance must not come at the cost of banality and mediocrity. Hence, students should be allowed to choose subjects they wanted to study, so as to create a happy, exciting and innovative future.
In recent years, universities have
started
giving more choices in
thier
courses.
Some
people
believe that college-goers should be
allowed
to
choose
subjects
, while others say that futuristic topics of the scientific nature should
be promoted
. My opinion is that, areas of interest of an individual should
be considered
while crafting an educational course for him.
On one hand, the emphasis is on keeping young generation employable and relevant. Proponents of such line of
thought
argue that learning technology is inevitable for the youth, and
therefore
it should
be made
a part of college
education
.
However
, such practices can lead to starvation of talent in arts and other social
education
streams. These tendencies can result in ushering of students, with artistic acumen, into technical streams. This can
be illustrated
by
many
workplace surveys, in which engineers working in such organizations have confessed to be in
wrong
line of work. Such outcomes can
be attributed
to going with an educational paradigm, during college days, which was not suited to one's abilities.
On the other hand
, a section of society believes that universities should enable
attendies
to
choose
subjects
on basis of their
own
liking. In my opinion, this is a welcome
change
as it can bring diversity in one's
education
.
For example
, an engineer who chose to study music in his college days can
end
up designing
next
generation of musical gadgets.
Moreover
,
people
studying focused streams such as medicines will be able to
choose
completely
different
subjects
, which can
admittedly
lead to more innovations in their respective fields.
To conclude
, keeping future workforce relevant is an
important
aspect of
education
.
Nevertheless
, it should
also
be considered
that such relevance
must
not
come
at the cost of banality and mediocrity.
Hence
, students should be
allowed
to
choose
subjects
they wanted to study,
so as to
create a happy, exciting and innovative future.